NIST Advanced Technology Program
Return to ATP Home Page
ATP Historical Award Statistics Business Reporting System Surveys EAO Economic Studies and Survey Results ATP Factsheets ATP Completed Projects Status Reports EAO Home Page
ATP Working Paper Series
Working Paper 05–01

Abstract

The United States has been an incubator for new technologies for rechargeable batteries, while Asian companies have developed the manufacturing expertise and made the requisite capital investment to profit from these technologies. This investigation examines the circumstances attending lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery developments as a vehicle to seek a better understanding of the factors affecting decision-making of U.S. manufacturers, specifically addressing the question: "Why are there no volume Li-ion battery manufacturers in the United States?" The United States has been an incubator for new technologies for rechargeable batteries, while Asian companies have developed the manufacturing expertise and made the requisite capital investment to profit from these technologies. This investigation examines the circumstances attending lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery developments as a vehicle to seek a better understanding of the factors affecting decision-making of U.S. manufacturers, specifically addressing the question: "Why are there no volume Li-ion battery manufac-turers in the United States?"

The conclusions are:

  • The U.S. battery companies "opted out" of volume manufacturing of Li-ion batteries, primarily because of a low return on investment compared with their existing business, the significant time and investment required from conception to commercialization, and the time and expense required to establish a sales organization in Japan to access product design opportunities and take advantage of them. Labor costs were not a major issue impeding large-volume production of the cells in the United States. The cost of labor in the United States was essentially the same as for the Japanese manufacturers domestically. The Asian strategy of providing facilities and loans to establish manufacturing locally and create jobs was a more important factor. Structural differences of the Japanese electronic products industry compared with the U.S. counterpart create barriers for U.S. firms seeking to market rechargeable batteries or battery materials in Japan. In markets for rechargeable batteries, customers are large, high technology-based electronics companies with their own battery manufacturing capability. Developing a product requires close contact with portable electronic device designers, which is more easily accomplished within the vertically integrated Asian companies than in the U.S. system where battery companies have little access to device designers. The tendency could be for technological development to follow manufacturing to East Asia, as a natural consequence of developing manufacturing expertise. Primary as well as rechargeable battery production will slowly shift to China, Korea, and Southeast Asia. U.S. manufacturers pursuing other budding energy technologies, such as fuel cells, will face similar issues.
  • Opportunities still exist for U.S. companies to successful-ly enter niche markets, such as those with medical, military, or space applications. Mechanisms for cooperation between government-academia and industry need to be implemented to assure that advanced materials technologies have the resources and direction to succeed

Return to Table of Contents or go to next section.

Date created: July 21, 2005
Last updated: August 4, 2005

Return to ATP Home Page

ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov  / Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov.

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department
Privacy policy / Security Notice / Accessibility Statement / Disclaimer / Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) /
No Fear Act Policy / NIST Information Quallity Standards / ExpectMore.gov (performance of federal programs)

Return to NIST Home Page
Return to ATP Home Page Return to NIST Home Page Go to the NIST Home Page