|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
NISTIR
6917 V. Observed Variations in Timellines for CommercializationIn Section V, expectations
about timelines for revenues are examined and compared with expected windows
of opportunity, by technology area. A. Expectations about the
Timeline for Commercialization
|
Figure 1.
When Can We Expect to See Revenues?![]() |
But there is considerable
variation across the entire time period. For IT applications, revenues
are expected for 28% of applications during the period of ATP funding
and for 64% of applications by a year after ATP funding ends, the highest
proportion for any technology area. Only 25% of materials-chemistry applications
and 32% of biotech applications are expected to generate revenues by a
year after ATP funding ends.
When we examine the
underlying data, we see that while the activity for IT peaks a
year after ATP funding ends, the expected peak in new applications reaching
the market for other technology areas appears a year later.
Electronics technologies
have some early applications, but then they experience a steep rise in
activity in the second year after ATP, followed by a fall-off more rapid
than in any other technology area except IT.
Materials-chemistry
and manufacturing-based applications build up somewhat more slowly
and tail off more slowly than electronics and IT.
Biotechnologies
have an initial spurt of activity in the second year after ATP funding
ends, then another spurt five or more years later.
If commercialization
plans are credible, we expect the window of market opportunity to shadow
the expected timing of revenues. This windows timing will pose a
constraint on commercial viability of the technologies in their planned
applications.
Figure 2 shows responses
to the following question:
What is the window of market
opportnity?
Response
choices:
Figure 2.
How Long Will the Window of Market Oppportunity Stay Open?![]() |
The expected windows of opportunity mirror expectations about the timeline to commercialization, with about a one-year lag. For IT, this is especially true. While 35% of applications across all technologies expect a market window of just one year after ATP funding ends, the proportion within IT is 52%, the highest such proportion for any technology area. As seen above, this is consistent with expectations of the timing of revenues for this technology group.
Most electronics applications
are under pressure to reach the market within about two years after ATP.
Only a few applicationslargely in biotechnologyare expected to see the market opportunity window open longer than five years after ATP.
Return to Table of Contents or go to VI. Factors Behind Observed Trends
Date created: March
4, 2003
Last updated:
April 12, 2005
ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov / Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department |