|
NISTIR
6888
Technology Adoption Indicators Applied to the ATP
Flow-Control Machining Project
Appendix
D
REMI Forecast Detail
In Figure
19, the first bar in year 2007 shows that the conventional technology
would reduce GDP by $1,120 million. The second bar shows that the FCM
technology would reduce GDP by $660 million. Therefore, in market segment
A, the FCM technology would save $460 million (= 1,120 - 660), or would
reduce the cost of meeting the regulation by 40% in terms of GDP compared
with the conventional technology in 2007, the first year of analysis.
Figure 20 shows the estimated reductions in employment. Using the FCM
technology would save 5,826 jobs in 2007 (jobs saved cannot be combined
between years). Figure 21 shows the estimated reductions in personal
income. Using the FCM technology would save $356 million in personal
income in 2007. Over the analysis period (2007 to 2009), total savings
would be $261 million in GDP and $244 million in personal income.
Figure 21.
Market A (Class I SV): Estimated Reductions in GDP
Figure 22.
Market A (Class I SV): Estimated Reductions in Employment
Figure 23.
Market A (Class I SV): Estimated Reductions in Personal Income
The estimated reductions
in GDP, employment, and personal income are then shown for market segment
C in Figures 22 , 23 , and 24 . In 2005, the year with the biggest impact
from using FCM technology, $415 million in GDP would be saved, 5,594
jobs would be saved, and $350 million in personal income would be saved.
Over the analysis period (2003 to 2007), total savings would be $982
million in GDP and $878 million in personal income.
Figure 24.
Market C (Class II SV): Estimated Reductions in GDP
Figure 25. Market C (Class II SV): Estimated Reductions
in Employment
Figure 26. Market C (Class II SV): Estimated Reductions
in Personal Income
Go to About
ATP or return to Table of Contents.
Date created:
June 11, 2003
Last updated:
August 3, 2005
|
