| Subpart
A-General |
| Sec. 295.1
Purpose. |
| (a) |
The
purpose of the Advanced Technology Program (ATP) is to assist
United States businesses to carry out research and development
on high risk, high pay-off, emerging and enabling technologies.
These technologies are: |
|
(1) |
High
risk, because the technical challenges make success uncertain; |
|
(2) |
High
pay-off, because when applied, they offer significant benefits
to the U.S. economy; and |
|
(3) |
Emerging
and enabling, because they offer wide breadth of potential application
and form an important technical basis for future commercial applications. |
| (b) |
The
rules in this part prescribe policies and procedures for the
award of cooperative agreements under the Advanced Technology
Program in order to ensure the fair treatment of all proposals.
While the Advanced Technology Program is authorized to enter
into grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts to carry out
its mission, these rules address only the award of cooperative
agreements. The program employs cooperative agreements rather
than grants because such agreements allow ATP to exercise appropriate
management oversight of projects and also to link ATP-funded
projects to ongoing R&D at the National Institute of Standards
and Technology wherever such linkage would increase the likelihood
of success of the project. |
| (c) |
In
carrying out the rules in this part, the Program endeavors to
put more emphasis on joint ventures and consortia with a broad
range of participants, including large companies, and less emphasis
on support of individual large companies.
|
| Sec. 295.2
Definitions. |
| (a) |
For
the purposes of ATP, the term award means Federal financial
assistance made under a grant or cooperative agreement. |
| (b) |
The
term company means a for-profit organization, including sole
proprietors, partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs),
or corporations. |
| (c) |
The
term cooperative agreement refers to a Federal assistance
instrument used whenever the principal purpose of the relationship
between the Federal Government and the recipient is the transfer
of money, property, or services, or anything of value to the
recipient to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation
authorized by Federal statute, rather than acquisition by purchase,
lease, or barter, of property or services for the direct benefit
or use of the Federal Government; and substantial involvement
is anticipated between the executive agency, acting for the Federal
Government, and the recipient during performance of the contemplated
activity. |
| (d) |
The
term direct costs means costs that can be identified
readily with activities carried out in support of a particular
final objective. A cost may not be allocated to an award as a
direct cost if any other cost incurred for the same purpose in
like circumstances has been assigned to an award as an indirect
cost. Because of the diverse characteristics and accounting practices
of different organizations, it is not possible to specify the
types of costs which may be classified as direct costs in all
situations. However, typical direct costs could include salaries
of personnel working on the ATP project and associated reasonable
fringe benefits such as medical insurance. Direct costs might
also include supplies and materials, special equipment required
specifically for the ATP project, and travel associated with
the ATP project. ATP shall determine the allowability of direct
costs in accordance with applicable Federal cost principles.
|
| (e) |
The
term foreign-owned company means a company other than
a United States-owned company as defined in 295.2(q). |
| (f) |
The
term grant means a Federal assistance instrument used
whenever the principal purpose of the relationship between the
Federal Government and the recipient is the transfer of money,
property, services, or anything of value to the recipient in
order to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation
authorized by Federal statute, rather than acquisition by purchase,
lease, or barter, of property or services for the direct benefit
or use of the Federal Government; and no substantial involvement
is anticipated between the executive agency, acting for the Federal
Government, and the recipient during performance of the contemplated
activity. |
| (g) |
The
term independent research organization (IRO) means a nonprofit
research and development corporation or association organized
under the laws of any state for the purpose of carrying out research
and development on behalf of other organizations.
|
| (h) |
The
term indirect costs means those costs incurred for common
or joint objectives that cannot be readily identified with activities
carried out in support of a particular final objective. A cost
may not be allocated to an award as an indirect cost if any other
cost incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances has
been assigned to an award as a direct cost. Because of diverse
characteristics and accounting practices it is not possible to
specify the types of costs which may be classified as indirect
costs in all situations. However, typical examples of indirect
costs include general administration expenses, such as the salaries
and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration,
maintenance, library expenses, and accounting. ATP shall determine
the allowability of indirect costs in accordance with applicable
Federal cost principles. |
| (i) |
The
term industry-led joint research and development
venture or joint venture means a business arrangement
that consists of two or more separately-owned, for-profit
companies that perform research and development in the project;
control the joint venture's membership, research directions,
and funding priorities; and share total project costs with
the Federal Government. The joint venture may include additional
companies, independent research organizations, universities,
and/or governmental laboratories (other than NIST) which
may or may not contribute funds (other than Federal funds)
to the project and perform research and development. A for-profit
company or an independent research organization may serve
as an Administrator and perform administrative tasks on behalf
of a joint venture, such as handling receipts and disbursements
of funds and making antitrust filings. The following activities
are not permissible for ATP-funded joint ventures: |
|
(1) |
Exchanging
information among competitors relating to costs, sales, profitability,
prices, marketing, or distribution of any product, process, or
service that is not reasonably required to conduct the research
and development that is the purpose of such venture; |
|
(2) |
Entering
into any agreement or engaging in any other conduct restricting,
requiring, or otherwise involving the production or marketing
by any person who is a party to such joint venture of any product,
process, or service, other than the production or marketing of
proprietary information developed through such venture, such
as patents and trade secrets; and |
|
(3) |
Entering
into any agreement or engaging in any other conduct: |
|
|
(i) |
To
restrict or require the sale, licensing, or sharing of inventions
or developments not developed through such venture, or |
|
|
(ii) |
To
restrict or require participation by such party in other research
and development activities, that is not reasonably required to
prevent misappropriation of proprietary information contributed
by any person who is a party to such venture or of the results
of such venture. |
| (j) |
The
term intellectual property means an invention
patentable under title 35, United States Code, or any patent
on such an invention. |
| (k) |
The
term large business for a particular ATP competition means
any business, including any parent company plus related subsidiaries,
having annual revenues in excess of the amount published by ATP
in the relevant annual notice of availability of funds required
by section 295.7(a) of this regulation. In establishing this
amount, ATP may consider the dollar value of the total revenues
of the 500th company in Fortune magazine's Fortune 500 listing. |
| (l) |
The
term matching funds or cost sharing means that
portion of project costs not borne by the Federal Government.
Sources of revenue to satisfy the required cost share include
cash and in-kind contributions. Cash contributions can be from
recipient, state, county, city, or other non-federal sources.
In-kind contributions can be made by recipients or non-federal
third parties (except subcontractors working on an ATP project)
and include but are not limited to equipment, research tools,
software, and supplies. Except as specified at Sec. 295.25 of
this regulation, the value of in-kind contributions shall be
determined in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, Subpart C,
Section 23. The value of in-kind contributions will be prorated
according to the share of total use dedicated to the ATP program.
ATP restricts the total value of in-kind contributions that can
be used to satisfy the cost share by requiring that such contributions
not exceed 30 percent of the non-federal share of the total project
costs. ATP shall determine the allowability of matching share
costs in accordance with applicable federal cost principles. |
| (m) |
The
term person shall be deemed to include corporations and
associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either
the United States, the laws of any of the Territories, the laws
of any State, or the laws of any foreign country.
|
| (n) |
The
term Program means the Advanced Technology Program. |
| (o) |
The
term Secretary means the Secretary of Commerce or the
Secretary's designee. |
| (p) |
The
term small business means a business that is independently
owned and operated, is organized for profit, and is not dominant
in the field of operation in which it is proposing, and meets
the other requirements found in 13 C.F.R. Part 121. |
| (q) |
The
term United States-owned company means a for-profit organization,
including sole proprietors, partnerships, or corporations, that
has a majority ownership or control by individuals who are citizens
of the United States.
|
| Sec. 295.3
Eligibility of United States and Foreign-Owned Businesses. |
| (a) |
A
company shall be eligible to receive an award from the Program
only if: |
|
(1) |
The
Program finds that the company's participation in the Program
would be in the economic interest of the United States, as
evidenced by investments in the United States in research,
development, and manufacturing (including, for example, the
manufacture of major components or subassemblies in the United
States); significant contributions to employment in the United
States; and agreement with respect to any technology arising
from assistance provided by the Program to promote the manufacture
within the United States of products resulting from that
technology (taking into account the goals of promoting the
competitiveness of United States industry), and to procure
parts and materials from competitive suppliers; and |
|
(2) |
Either
the company is a United Statesowned company, or the Program finds
that the company is incorporated in the United States and has
a parent company which is incorporated in a country which affords
to United States-owned companies opportunities, comparable to
those afforded to any other company, to participate in any joint
venture similar to those authorized under the Program; affords
the United Statesowned companies local investment opportunities
comparable to those afforded to any other company; and affords
adequate and effective protection for the intellectual property
rights of United States-owned companies. |
| (b) |
The
Program may, within 30 days after notice to Congress, suspend
a company or joint venture from continued assistance under the
Program if the Program determines that the company, the country
of incorporation of the company or a parent company, or the joint
venture has failed to satisfy any of the criteria contained in
paragraph (a) of this section, and that it is in the national
interest of the United States to do so. |
| (c) |
Companies
owned by legal residents (green card holders) may apply to the
Program, but before an award can be given, the owner(s) must
either become a citizen or ownership must be transferred to a
U.S. citizen(s).
|
| Sec. 295.4
The Selection Process. |
| (a) |
The
selection process for awards is a multistep process based on
the criteria listed in section 295.6. Source evaluation boards
(SEB) are established to ensure that all proposals receive careful
consideration. In the first step, called "preliminary screening," proposals
may be eliminated by the SEB that do not meet the requirements
of this Part or the annual Federal Register Program announcement.
Typical but not exclusive of the reasons for eliminating a proposal
at this stage are that the proposal is deemed to have serious
deficiencies in either the technical or business plan; involves
product development rather than high-risk R&D; is not industry-led;
is significantly overpriced or underpriced given the scope of
the work; does not meet the requirements set out in the notice
of availability of funds issued pursuant to section 295.7; or
does not meet the cost-sharing requirement. NIST will also examine
proposals that have been submitted to a previous competition
to determine whether substantive revisions have been made to
the earlier proposal, and, if not, may reject the proposal. |
| (b) |
In
the second step, referred to as the "technical and business
review," proposals are evaluated under the criteria found
in section 295.6. Proposals judged by the SEB after considering
the technical and business evaluations to have the highest merit
based on the selection criteria receive further consideration
and are referred to as "semifinalists." |
| (c) |
In
the third step, referred to as "selection of finalists," the
SEB prepares a final ranking of semifinalist proposals by a majority
vote, based on the evaluation criteria in section 295.6. During
this step, the semifinalist proposers will be invited to an oral
review of their proposals with NIST, and in some cases site visits
may be required. Subject to the provisions of section 295.6,
a list of ranked finalists is submitted to the Selecting Official. |
| (d) |
In
the final step, referred to as "selection of recipients," the
Selecting Official selects funding recipients from among the
finalists, based upon the SEB rank order of the proposals on
the basis of all selection criteria (section 295.6); assuring
an appropriate distribution of funds among technologies and their
applications; the availability of funds; and adherence to the
Program selection criteria. The Program reserves the right to
deny awards in any case where information is uncovered which
raises a reasonable doubt as to the responsibility of the proposer.
The decision of the Selecting Official is final. |
| (e) |
NIST
reserves the right to negotiate the cost and scope of the proposed
work with the proposers that have been selected to receive awards.
For example, NIST may request that the proposer delete from the
scope of work a particular task that is deemed by NIST to be
product development or otherwise inappropriate for ATP support.
|
Sec.
295.5 Use of Pre-Proposals in the Selection Process.
To reduce
proposal preparation costs incurred by proposers and
to make the selection process more efficient, NIST may
use mandatory or optional preliminary qualification processes
based on preproposals. In such cases, announcements requesting
pre-proposals will be published as indicated in section
295.7, and will seek abbreviated proposals (pre-proposals)
that address both of the selection criteria, but in considerably
less detail than full proposals. The Program will review
the pre-proposals in accordance with the selection criteria
and provide written feedback to the proposers to determine
whether the proposed projects appear sufficiently promising
to warrant further development into full proposals. Proposals
are neither "accepted" nor "rejected" at
the preproposal stage. When the full proposals are received
in response to the notice of availability of funds described
in section 295.7, the review and selection process will
occur as described in section 295.4.
|
Sec.
295.6 Criteria for Selection.
The evaluation
criteria to be used in selecting any proposal for funding
under this program, and their respective weights, are
listed in this section. No proposal will be funded unless
the Program determines that it has scientific and technological
merit and that the proposed technology has strong potential
for broad-based economic benefits to the nation. Additionally,
no proposal will be funded that does not require Federal
support, that is product development rather than high-risk
R&D, that does not display an appropriate level of
commitment from the proposer, or does not have an adequate
technical and commercialization plan. |
| (a) |
Scientific
and Technological Merit (50%)
The proposed technology must be highly innovative. The research
must be challenging, with high technical risk. It must be aimed
at overcoming an important problem(s) or exploiting a promising
opportunity. The technical leverage of the technology must be
adequately explained. The research must have a strong potential
for advancing the state of the art and contributing significantly
to the U.S. scientific and technical knowledge base. The technical
plan must be clear and concise; clearly identify the core innovation,
the technical approach, major technical hurdles, and the attendant
risks; and clearly establish feasibility through adequately detailed
plans linked to major technical barriers. The plan must address
the questions of "what, how, where, when, why, and by whom" in
substantial detail. The Program will assess the proposing team's
relevant experience for pursuing the technical plan. The team
carrying out the work must demonstrate a high level of scientific/technical
expertise to conduct the R&D and have access to the necessary
research facilities. |
| (b) |
Potential
for Broad-Based Economic Benefits (50%)
The proposed technology must have a strong potential to generate
substantial benefits to the nation that extend significantly
beyond the direct returns to the proposing organization(s). The
proposal must explain why ATP support is needed and what difference
ATP funding is expected to make in terms of what will be accomplished
with the ATP funding versus without it. The pathways to economic
benefit must be described, including the proposer's plan for
getting the technology into commercial use, as well as additional
routes that might be taken to achieve broader diffusion of the
technology. The proposal should identify the expected returns
that the proposer expects to gain, as well as returns that are
expected to accrue to others, i.e., spillover effects. The Program
will assess the proposer's relevant experience and level of commitment
to the project and project's organizational structure and management
plan, including the extent to which participation by small businesses
is encouraged and is a key component in a joint venture proposal,
and for large company single proposers, the extent to which subcontractor/subrecipient
teaming arrangements are featured and are a key component of
the proposal. |
Sec.
295.7 Notice of Availability of Funds.
The Program
shall publish at least annually a Federal Register notice
inviting interested parties to submit proposals, and
may more frequently publish invitations for proposals
in the Commerce Business Daily, based upon the
annual notice. Proposals must be submitted in accordance
with the guidelines in the ATP Proposal Preparation
Kit as identified in the published notice. Proposals
will only be considered for funding when submitted in
response to an invitation published in the Federal
Register, or a related announcement in the Commerce
Business Daily.
|
Sec 295.8
Intellectual Property Rights; Publication of Research
Results. |
| (a) |
(1) |
Patent
Rights: Title to inventions arising from assistance provided
by the Program must vest in a company or companies incorporated
in the United States. Joint ventures shall provide to NIST
a copy of their written agreement which defines the disposition
of ownership rights among the members of the joint venture,
and their contractors and subcontractors as appropriate,
that complies with the first sentence of this paragraph.
The United States will reserve a non-exclusive, nontransferable,
irrevocable, paid-up license to practice or have practiced
for or on behalf of the United States any such intellectual
property, but shall not, in the exercise of such license,
publicly disclose proprietary information related to the
license. Title to any such intellectual property shall not
be transferred or passed, except to a company incorporated
in the United States, until the expiration of the first patent
obtained in connection with such intellectual property. Nothing
in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the licensing
to any company of intellectual property rights arising from
assistance provided under this section. |
|
(2) |
Patent
Procedures: Each award by the Program shall include provisions
assuring the retention of a governmental use license in each
disclosed invention, and the government's retention of march-in
rights. In addition, each award by the Program will contain
procedures regarding reporting of subject inventions by the
funding Recipient to the Program, including the subject inventions
of members of the joint venture (if applicable) in which
the funding Recipient is a participant, contractors, and
subcontractors of the funding Recipient. The funding Recipient
shall disclose such subject inventions to the Program within
two months after the inventor discloses it in writing to
the Recipient's designated representative responsible for
patent matters. The disclosure shall consist of a detailed,
written report which provides the Program with the following:
the title of the present invention; the names of all inventors;
the name and address of the assignee (if any); an acknowledgment
that the United States has rights in the subject invention;
the filing date of the present invention, or, in the alternative,
a statement identifying that the Recipient determined that
filing was not feasible; an abstract of the disclosure; a
description or summary of the present invention; the background
of the present invention or the prior art; a description
of the preferred embodiments; and what matter is claimed.
Upon issuance of the patent, the funding Recipient or Recipients
must notify the Program accordingly, providing it with the
Serial Number of the patent as issued, the date of issuance,
a copy of the disclosure as issued, and if appropriate, the
name, address, and telephone number(s) of an assignee. |
| (b) |
Copyrights:
Except as otherwise specifically provided for in an Award, funding
Recipients under the Program may establish claim to copyright
subsisting in any data first produced in the performance of the
award. When claim is made to copyright, the funding Recipient
shall affix the applicable copyright notice of 17 U.S.C. § 401
or § 402 and acknowledgment of Government sponsorship to
the data when and if the data are delivered to the Government,
are published, or are deposited for registration as a published
work in the U.S. Copyright Office. The funding recipient shall
grant to the Government, and others acting on its behalf, a paid
up, nonexclusive, irrevocable, worldwide license for all such
data to reproduce, prepare derivative works, perform publicly
and display publicly, and for data other than computer software
to distribute to the public by or on behalf of the Government. |
| (c) |
Publication
of Research Results: The decision on whether or not to
publish research results will be made by the funding Recipient(s).
Unpublished intellectual property owned and developed by
any business or joint research and development venture receiving
funding or by any member of such a joint venture may not
be disclosed by any officer or employee of the Federal Government
except in accordance with a written agreement between the
owner or developer and the Program. The licenses granted
to the Government under section 295.8(b) shall not be considered
a waiver of this requirement.
|
Sec.
295.9 Protection of Confidential Information.
As required
by section 278n(d)(5) of Title 15 of the United States
Code, the following information obtained by the Secretary
on a confidential basis in connection with the activities
of any business or joint research and development venture
receiving funding under the program shall be exempt from
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act |
| |
(1) |
Information
on the business operation of any member of the business or joint
venture; |
| |
(2) |
Trade
secrets possessed by any business or any member of the joint
venture.
|
Sec.
295.10 Special Reporting and Auditing Requirements.
Each award
by the Program shall contain procedures regarding technical,
business, and financial reporting and auditing requirements
to ensure that awards are being used in accordance with
the Program's objectives and applicable Federal cost
principles. The purpose of the technical reporting is
to monitor "best effort" progress toward overall
project goals. The purpose of the business reporting
system is to monitor project performance against the
Program's mission as required by the Government Performance
and Results Act (GPRA) mandate for program evaluation.
The audit standards to be applied to ATP awards are the
Government Auditing Standards (GAS) issued by the Comptroller
General of the United States (also known as yellow book
standards) and the ATP program-specific audit guidelines.
The ATP program-specific audit guidelines include guidance
on the number of audits required under an award. In the
interest of efficiency, the recipients are encouraged
to retain their own independent CPA firm to perform these
audits. The Department of Commerce's Office of Inspector
General (OIG) reserves the right to conduct audits as
deemed necessary and appropriate.
|
| Sec. 295.11
Technical and Educational Services for ATP Recipients. |
| (a) |
Under
the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, the National Institute
of Standards and Technology of the Technology Administration
has the authority to enter into cooperative research and development
agreements with non-Federal parties to provide personnel, services,
facilities, equipment, or other resources except funds toward
the conduct of specified research or development efforts which
are consistent with the missions of the laboratory. In turn,
the National Institute of Standards and Technology has the authority
to accept funds, personnel, services, facilities, equipment,
and other resources from the non- Federal party or parties for
the joint research effort. Cooperative research and development
agreements do not include procurement contracts or cooperative
agreements as those terms are used in sections 6303, 6304, and
6305 of title 31, United States Code. |
| (b) |
In
no event will the National Institute of Standards and Technology
enter into a cooperative research and development agreement with
a recipient of awards under the Program which provides for the
payment of Program funds from the award recipient to the National
Institute of Standards and Technology. |
| (c) |
From
time to time, ATP may conduct public workshops and undertake
other educational activities to foster the collaboration of funding
Recipients with other funding resources for purposes of further
development and commercialization of ATP-related technologies.
In no event will ATP provide recommendations, endorsements, or
approvals of any ATP funding Recipients to any outside party.
|
| Subpart
B-Assistance to United States Industry-Led Joint Research
and Development Ventures |
Sec.
295.20 Types of Assistance Available.
This Subpart
describes the types of assistance that may be provided
under the authority of 15 U.S.C. § 278n(b)(1). Such
assistance includes but is not limited to: |
| (a) |
Partial
start-up funding for joint research and development ventures. |
| (b) |
A
minority share of the cost of joint research and development
ventures for up to 5 years. |
| (c) |
Equipment,
facilities, and personnel for joint research and development
ventures.
|
Sec.
295.21 Qualifications of Proposers.
Subject
to the limitations set out in section 295.3, assistance
under this Subpart is available only to industry-led
joint research and development ventures. These joint
ventures may include universities, independent research
organizations, and governmental entities. Proposals for
funding under this Subpart may be submitted on behalf
of a joint venture by a for-profit company or an independent
research organization that is a member of the joint venture.
Proposals should include letters of commitment or excerpts
of such letters from all proposed members of the joint
venture, verifying the availability of cost-sharing funds,
and authorizing the party submitting the proposal to
act on behalf of the venture with the Program on all
matters pertaining to the proposal. No costs shall be
incurred under an ATP project by the joint venture members
until such time as a joint venture agreement has been
executed by all of the joint venture members and approved
by NIST. NIST will withhold approval until it determines
that a sufficient number of members have signed the joint
venture agreement. Costs will only be allowed after the
execution of the joint venture agreement and approval
by NIST.
|
| Sec. 295.22
Limitations on Assistance. |
| (a) |
An
award will be made under this Subpart only if the award will
facilitate the formation of a joint venture or the initiation
of a new research and development project by an existing joint
venture. |
| (b) |
The
total value of any in-kind contributions used to satisfy the
cost-sharing requirement may not exceed 30 percent of the non-federal
share of the total project costs.
|
Sec.
295.23 Dissolution of Joint Research and Development
Ventures.
Upon dissolution
of any joint research and development venture receiving
funds under these procedures or at a time otherwise agreed
upon, the Federal Government shall be entitled to a share
of the residual assets of the joint venture proportional
to the Federal share of the costs of the joint venture
as determined by independent audit.
|
Sec.
295.24 Registration.
Joint ventures
selected for funding under the Program must notify the
Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission
under the National Cooperative Research Act of 1984.
No funds will be released prior to receipt by the Program
of copies of such notification.
|
| Sec. 295.25
Special Rule for the Valuation of Transfers Between Separately-Owned
Joint Venture Members. |
| (a) |
Applicability.
This section applies to transfers of goods, including computer
software, and services provided by the transferor related to
the maintenance of those goods, when those goods or services
are transferred from one joint venture member to other separately
owned joint venture members. |
| (b) |
Rule.
The greater amount of the actual cost of the transferred goods
and services as determined in accordance with applicable Federal
cost principles, or 75 percent of the best customer price of
the transferred goods and services, shall be deemed to be allowable
costs; provided, however, that in no event shall the aggregate
of these allowable costs exceed 30 percent of the non-Federal
share of the total cost of the joint research and development
program. |
| (c) |
Definition.
The term best customer price shall mean the GSA schedule price,
or if such price is unavailable, the lowest price at which a
sale was made during the last 12 months prior to the transfer
of the particular good or service.
|
| Subpart
C-Assistance to Single-Proposer U.S. Businesses |
Sec.
295.30 Types of Assistance Available.
This Subpart
describes the types of assistance that may be provided under
the authority of 15 U.S.C. § 278n(b)(2). Such assistance
includes but is not limited to entering into cooperative agreements
with United States businesses, especially small businesses.
|
Sec.
295.31 Qualification of Proposers.
Awards under
this Subpart will be available to all businesses, subject to
the limitations set out in section 295.3 and 295.32. |
| Sec. 295.32
Limitations on Assistance. |
| (a) |
The
Program will not directly provide funding under this Subpart
to any governmental entity, academic institution, or independent
research organization. |
| (b) |
For
proposals submitted to ATP after December 31, 1997, awards to
large businesses made under this Subpart shall not exceed 40
percent of the total project costs of those awards in any year
of the award. |
| (c) |
Awards
under this Subpart may not exceed $2,000,000, or be for more
than 3 years, unless the Secretary provides a written explanation
to the authorizing committees of both Houses of Congress and
then, only after 30 days during which both Houses of Congress
are in session. No funding for indirect costs, profits, or management
fees shall be available for awards made under this Subpart. |
| (d) |
The
total value of any in-kind contributions used to satisfy a cost-sharing
requirement may not exceed 30 percent of the non-Federal share
of the total project costs. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|