GCR 06-891 - Bridging from Project Case Study to Portfolio Analysis in a Public R&D Program
A Framework for Evaluation and Introduction

References

Advanced Technology Program (2001). Performance of 50 Completed ATP Projects. Status Report Number 2, NIST SP 950-2. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Advanced Technology Program (Recent edition). Proposal Preparation Kit. Information about proposing to ATP is available on line at http://www.atp.nist.gov.

Branch, K., M. Peiffers, R. Ruegg, and R. Vallario (2001). The Science Manager's Resource Guide to Case Studies. DE-ACO6-76RL01830. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science.

Dow Theory Forecast and Quadrix Stock-Rating System can be found at the Dow Theory Newsletter Website, http://www.dowtheory.com.

Geisler, E. (2000). The Metrics of Science and Technology. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2000, pp. 243-266.

KPMG, now Bearing Point (1997). Methodology for Regulatory Test of Financial Responsibility Using Financial Ratios. The report may be viewed at http://www.ed.gov/offices/ OPE/PPI/finanrep.html.

Long, W. (1999). Performance of Completed Projects, Status Report Number 1. NIST SP 950-1. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Kilbridge, P., E. Welebob, and D. Classen (2001). Overview of the Leapfrog Group Evaluation Tool for Computerized Physician Order Entry. December 2001. The report may be viewed at http://www.fcg.com by clicking on the report cover.

Martin, S., D. Winfield, A. Kenyon, J. Farris, M. Bala, and T. Bingham (1998). A Framework for Estimating the National Economic Benefits of ATP Funding of Medical Technologies; Preliminary Applications to Tissue Engineering Projects Funded from 1990 to 1996. NIST GCR 97-737. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Powell, J. and K. Lellock (2000). Development, Commercialization, and Diffusion ofEnabling Technologies: Progress Report for Projects Funded 1993-1997. NISTIR 6491. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Ruegg, R. (2003). Benchmarking Evaluation of Public Science and Technology Programs in the United States, Canada, Israel, and Finland; Proceedings of the Impact Assessment Benchmarking Workshop. Embassy of Finland, Washington, DC, September 25, 2002. Helsinki, Finland: Tekes—National Technology Agency of Finland, 2003.

Ruegg, R. and I. Feller (2003). A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment: Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP's First Decade. GCR 02-842. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Smith, P. (2001). "Component Indicators of System Performance." Presentation at the OECD Conference, Measuring UP; Improving Health Systems Performance in OECD Countries, Ottawa, Canada, November 5-7, 2001.

U.S. Congress (1988). Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-418). U.S. Congress (1991). American Technology Preeminence Act of 1991 (P.L. 102-245).

U.S. General Accounting Office (USGAO) (1996). Executive Guide, Effectively Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act. GAO Report GGD-96-118. Washington, DC.

Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research—Design and Methods. Applied Social Methods Series, vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications

Return to Table of Contents or go to next section.

Date created: June 1, 2006
Last updated: July 3, 2006

ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov  / Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov.

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department
Privacy policy / Security Notice / Accessibility Statement / Disclaimer / Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) /
No Fear Act Policy / NIST Information Quallity Standards / ExpectMore.gov (performance of federal programs)