NIST Advanced Technology Program
Return to ATP Home Page
ATP Historical Award Statistics Business Reporting System Surveys EAO Economic Studies and Survey Results ATP Factsheets ATP Completed Projects Status Reports EAO Home Page
NIST GCR 03-844
Low-Cost Manufacturing Process Technology for Amorphous Silicon Detector Panels: Applications in Digital Mammography and Radiography

References

Alexander, W. 1999. “ASCO and ACOG Update: Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention.” Oncology Issues 14(4):13, 27–28.

American Cancer Society. 2002a. Cancer Facts & Figures 2002. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.

American Cancer Society. 2002b. “Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer.” Cancer 94(10): 2766–2792.

American Cancer Society. 2002c. “Cancer Reference Information: Can Breast Cancer Be Found Early.” Available at: <http://www.cancer.org/>.

AuntMinnie. 2002 “ACR Blasts PDQ Decision.” Available at: <http://www.AuntMinnie.com> January 28.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2002. “Medicare Reimbursements for Mammography Services.” Department of Health and Human Services.

Edelheit, Lewis (Senior Vice President, General Electric Company). 2001. Interview in December 2001.

Evans, F.W. 1999. “Ways to Avoid False Positive Mammograms.” Oncology News 8(8). Available at: <http://www.cancernetwork.com/journals/onnews/n9908w.htm>.

Firstmark. 2001. Market Survey for 2002 Firstmark, Campton NH. Available at: <http://www.firstmark.com>.

Fischer Imaging. 2001. Press Release, Sept 25 2001. Available at: <http://www.fischerimaging.com/press>.

Fratt, Lisa. 2002.“Implementing Digital: DR Cost Justifications, Dollars and Cents.” Medical Imaging. January [on-line]. Available at: <http://www.medicalimagingmag.com/>.

Freer, T. 2001. “Use of CAD Increases the Early Detection of Breast Cancer by 20 Percent.” Oncology News International 10(2). Available at: <http://www.cancernetwork.com/journals/oncnews/n0102d.htm>.

Freiherr, G. 1999. Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry Magazine. Cannon Communications, LLC. January. Available at: <http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/99/01/005.html>.

Frost and Sullivan. 1999. Introduction to Cardiac Imaging Markets. San Jose, CA: Frost and Sullivan.

———. 2001. World X-Ray Mammography Markets. San Jose, CA: Frost and Sullivan.

———. 2002. U.S. and European Digital Radiography Markets. San Jose, CA: Frost and Sullivan.

Garcia, A. 2001. Interview.

———. 2002. Interview.

General Electric. 2001. “Introduction to Digital X-Ray Technology.” Available at: <http://www.gemedicalsystems.com/rad/xr/education/>.

———. 2001a. “Cardiac Imaging: Innova 2000 Applications.” November. Available at: <http://www.gemedicalsystems.com/cardiology/>.

———. 2002. “Senographe 2000D Financial Pro-Formas.” January. Available at: <http://www.gemedicalsystems.com/rad/whc/products/2000d_roi.html>.

———. 2002a. “Revolution XR/d Financial Pro-Formas.” January. Available at: <http://www.gemedicalsystems.com/rad/xr/radio/products/xqi_proforma.html>.

General Electric Global Research Staff. 2001. Interviews with GE Global Research Staff in September 2001.

Giambattista, Brian (General Electric Medical Systems). 2001. Interview in October 2001.

Gilblom, D. (PerkinElmer). 2001. Interview in October 2001.

Gotzsche, P. and O. Olsen. 2001. “Systematic Review of Screening for Breast Cancer with Mammography.” Lancet 358:1284–85, 1340–1342.

Granfors, P.R., and R. Aufrichtig. 2000. “Performance of 41 X 41 cm2 Amorphous Silicon Flat Panel X-Ray Detector for Radiographic Imaging Applications.” Medical Physics 6:1324–1331.

Institute of Medicine. 2001. Mammography and Beyond: Developing Technologies for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.

Jardines, L. et al. 2001. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Melville, NY: PRR Publishing.

Jong, R.A. et al. 2002. “Evaluation of Cancer Detection Using a CAD System and Digitized Mammograms.” Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, June 22–25. Bremen, Germany.

Katz, J. 2001. “Business Outlook: Prescription for Prosperity.” Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry Magazine, March. Available at: <http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/01/03/001.html>.

Kornguth, P.J., and R.C. Bentley. 2001. “Mammographic–Pathological Correlation.” Journal of Women’s Imaging 3(4):134–145.

Lawrence Livermore Laboratories. August 1995. “Conventional Mammography.” August. Available at: <http://www.llnl.gov/eng/ee/erd/siprg/mamconventional.html>.

Lawson, H.W. et al. 2000. “Implementing Recommendations for the Early Detection of Breast and Cervical Cancer Among Low Income Women.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 49(2):37–55.

Lewin, J.M. et al. 2000. “Clinical Evaluation of Full Field Digital Mammography.” Radiology 218:873–880.

Lichtman, S.M. 1996. “Breast Cancer Screening Is Underused, Although Clearly Beneficial, in Elderly Women.” Primary Care & Cancer 16(5):5–6.

Markey, M., J.Y. Lo, and C.E. Floyd. 2002. “Differences Between CAD of Breast Masses and that of Calcifications.” Radiology 223:489–493.

Medscape. 2001. “Comparison with Previous Mammography Improves Yield of Diagnostic Imaging.” Available at: <http://radiology.medscape.com/reuters/prof/2001/05/05.09/20010508clin013.html>.

Miller, B.A. et al., eds. 1996. Racial and Ethnic Patterns of Cancer in the United States 1988–1992. NIH Publication No. 96-4104. Bethesda, MD: NIH.

National Cancer Institute. 2001a. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review, 1995 through 1997. Bethesda, MD: NIH.

———. 2001b. “Breast Cancer Coverage by Private Health Insurers.” State Cancer Legislation Database Program. Available at: <http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/digestpage/state-legislation.htm>.

———. 2002.“Cancer Facts: Screening Mammograms.” Available at: <http://cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/5_28.htm>.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2000. Strategic Research Plan to Reduce Health Disparities. Bethesda, MD: NIH.

Norton, A. 2002. “Study Recharges Debate on the Value of Mammograms.” Available at: <http://www.buildingbetterhealth.com/topic>.

Nystrom, L. et al. 2002. “Long Term Effects of Mammography Screening: Updated Overview of the Swedish Randomized Trials.” Lancet 359:9310, 909–19.

Oncology News. 2001. “Use of CAD Increases the Early Detection of Breast Cancer by 20%.” Oncology News 10(2). Available at: <http://www.cancernetwork..com/journals/oncnews/n0102d.htm>.

Pisano, E.D. 2001. “Digital vs. Film Mammography Trial Begins.” Oncology News International 10:11. Available at: <http://www.cancernetwork.com/journals/oncnews/n0111k.htm>.

Porter, Peggy L., Amira Y. El-Bastawissi, Margaret T. Mandelson, Ming Gang Lin, Najma Khalid, Elizabeth A. Watney, Laura Cousens, Donna White, Stephen Taplin, and Emily White. 1999. “Breast Tumor Characteristics as Predictors of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers.Journal of National Cancer Institute 91(23):2020–8.

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). 2001. Conference Proceedings.

November 25–30, McCormick Place, Chicago, Illinois. Oak Brook, IL: RSNA.

———. 2002. “Diagnosing the Effectiveness of Digital Mammography.” RSNA News, January. Available at: <http://www.rsna.org/publications/rsnanews/jan02/mammogram_1.html>.

Reaney, P. 2002 “Breast Cancer Screening Does Reduce Death Rates, UN Researchers Say.” March 19. Available at: <http://www.aunt Minnie.com>.

Rong, X. et al. 2001. “Comparison of an a-Si Flat Panel Digital Chest Radiography System with Screen/Film Radiography.” Medical Physics 28(11): 2328–2335.

Schubert, S.F. 2002. Correspondence, General Electric Medical Systems. January 14, 2002.

Shtern. 1999. Report of the Joint Working Group on Telemammography/Teleradiology and Information Management. Presented at the Working Group on Telemammography/Teleradiology and Information Management, Washington, D.C. March 15–17, 1999.

SMG Marketing Group. 2000. 2000 Market Report: Diagnostic Imaging Centers. Chicago, IL: SMG.

Stoutjesdijk, M.J. 2001. “MRI Superior to Mammography in Screening High Risk Women for Breast Cancer.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93:1095–1102.

Stoutjesdijk, Mark J., Carla Boetes, Gerrit J. Jager, Louk Beex, Peter Bult, Jan H. C. L. Hendriks, Robert J. F. Laheij, Leon Massuger, Lya E. van Die, Theo Wobbes, and Jelle O. Barentsz. 2001. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography in Women With a Hereditary Risk of Breast Cancer.” Journal of National Cancer Institute 93:1095–1102.

Thompson, T.L. 2002. “Tabar Prevails Upon Mammographers to Focus on Stellate.” Available at: <http://www.auntminnie.com>, February 27. 2002.

U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2001. National Labor Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 1997. “Final Regulations for the Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992.” Federal Register 62(208): 55952–55991. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Wagner, Steven. 2001. “Technology, outcomes bolster mammography.” Diagnostic Imaging. October [on-line]. Available at: <http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/breastimaging/>.

Yulei, J., R.M. Nishikawa, R.A. Schmidt et al. 2001. “Potential of CAD to Reduce Variability of Radiologists’ Interpretation of Mammograms Depicting Microcalcification.” Radiology 220:787–794.

Return to Table of Contents or go to Related Reading.

Date created: April 25, 2003
Last updated: August 2, 2005

Return to ATP Home Page

ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov  / Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov.

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department
Privacy policy / Security Notice / Accessibility Statement / Disclaimer / Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) /
No Fear Act Policy / NIST Information Quallity Standards / ExpectMore.gov (performance of federal programs)

Return to NIST Home Page
Return to ATP Home Page Return to NIST Home Page Go to the NIST Home Page