NIST Advanced Technology Program
Return to ATP Home Page
ATP Historical Award Statistics Business Reporting System Surveys EAO Economic Studies and Survey Results ATP Factsheets ATP Completed Projects Status Reports EAO Home Page
SURVEY OF ATP APPLICANTS 2000
7. ATP Awards Attract Additional Funding
Left to right:  Bioresearchers,  Bose Eienstein Condensate, Circuit Board,  Data Acquisition System, and Tissue Engineering

Company researchers often have difficulty obtaining funds for high-risk research, whether from internal company resources or from external sources of support. Through its cost-shared funding, the Advanced Technology Program (ATP) provides leverage to and validation of company efforts in high-risk research. Evidence from the Survey of ATP Applicants 2000 shows that an ATP award helps the company to attract additional funding to a research area.

Respondents were asked to estimate:

  • the amount of funding their company devoted to the research area represented by their proposed ATP project in the 3 years leading up to the proposal
  • the amount of funding committed to the research area since proposal submission

Respondents also were asked to indicate how much of the funding came from internal company sources, and how much from external sources (government programs or
outside investors).

Image of laboratory scientist at a computer.ATP awards attract additional funding from internal company sources

  • In the 3 years prior to submitting the proposal, ATP awardees on average devoted $490,000 in funding from internal sources to the research area represented by the proposed ATP project. Since submitting the proposal, company funding commitments increased to $1.4 million on average. (See Figure 1.)
  • By comparison, nonawardees on average experienced no change in funding from internal sources in the research area of the proposed ATP project.
  • Among ATP awardees, 72 percent indicate that funding from internal sources has increased since submitting the proposal, while among nonawardees only 28 percent indicate that internal funding has increased.

FIGURE 1. Funding from Internal Sources Devoted to Research Area Represented by Proposed ATP Project

FIGURE 1. Funding from Internal Sources Devoted to Research Area Represented by Proposed ATP Project
[Descriptive link for Figure 1]

Picture of co-workers discussing busiiness around a conference table.ATP awards attract additional funding from extrnal sources

  • In the 3 years prior to submitting the proposal, ATP awardees on average devoted $140,000 in funding from external sources to the research area represented by the proposed ATP project. Since submitting the proposal, funding commitments from external sources (excluding ATP) increased to $640,000 on average. (See Figure 2.)
  • By comparison, nonawardees on average experienced a decline in funding from external sources in the research area of the proposed ATP projects.
  • Among ATP awardees, 35 percent indicate that funding from external sources has increased since submitting the proposal, while among nonawardees only 18 percent indicate that external funding has increased.

FIGURE 2. Applicant Beliefs on the Importance of Patent or Copyright for Project Results
FIGURE 2. Applicant Beliefs on the Importance of Patent or Copyright for Project Results
[Descriptive link for Figure 2]

Return to Table of Contents or go to Factsheet 8.

Date created: June 24, 2003
Last updated: August 2, 2005

Return to ATP Home Page

ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov  / Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov.

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department
Privacy policy / Security Notice / Accessibility Statement / Disclaimer / Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) /
No Fear Act Policy / NIST Information Quallity Standards / ExpectMore.gov (performance of federal programs)

Return to NIST Home Page
Return to ATP Home Page Return to NIST Home Page Go to the NIST Home Page