NIST Advanced Technology Program
Return to ATP Home Page
ATP Historical Award Statistics Business Reporting System Surveys EAO Economic Studies and Survey Results ATP Factsheets ATP Completed Projects Status Reports EAO Home Page
SURVEY OF ATP APPLICANTS 2000
1. Why Do Companies Apply for ATP Funding?

Left to right:  Bioresearchers,  Bose Eienstein Condensate, Circuit Board,  Data Acquisition System, and Tissue Engineering

The Advanced Technology Program (ATP) fosters innovation in the United States by partnering with industry to support high-risk Research and Development (R&D) with great potential for broad-based economic benefit. ATP also encourages R&D collaboration between companies and other organizations. The Survey of ATP Applicants 2000 collected information on factors that are important to companies in their decision to apply to ATP.

Respondents were asked to indicate the importance of a number of factors in reaching their decision to apply for ATP funding. The factors can be grouped as follows:

  1. ATP funding helps overcome unavailability or instability of internal company funding, or dependence of internal funding on external funding support
  2. ATP funding provides external validation for the technological or commercial potential of the R&D project
  3. ATP funding facilitates R&D collaboration among different
    organizations

Nearly all ATP applicants indicate that unavailability or instability of internal company funding, or dependence of internal funding on receiving external support, are important factors in their decision to apply to ATP

  • Internal company funding is not available. 88 percent of applicants indicate this was "extremely important" or "very important" in their decision to apply to ATP. Another 10 percent report that it was "somewhat important." (See Figure 1.)
  • ATP provides stability of funding for the project over time. 75 percent of applicants indicate this was "extremely important" or "very important" in their decision to apply to ATP. Another 17 percent report that it was "somewhat important."
  • Internal company funding and commitment to the project depend on receiving external funding. 71 percent of applicants indicate this was "extremely important" or "very important" in their decision to apply to ATP. Another 17 percent report that it was "somewhat important."

Most ATP applicants indicate that external validation of the technological or commercial potential of the R&D project was an important factor in their decision to apply to ATP

  • ATP funding provides external validation of the technological potential of the project. 55 percent of applicants indicate this was "extremely important" or "very important" in their decision to apply to ATP. Another 28 percent report that it was "somewhat important."
  • ATP funding provides external validation of the commercial potential of the project. 43 percent of applicants indicate this was "extremely important" or "very important" in their decision to apply to ATP. Another 35 percent report that it was "somewhat important."

Most ATP applicants indicate that fostering R&D collaboration among different organizations was an important factor in their decision to apply to ATP

  • ATP funding facilitates collaboration among different organizations. 44 percent of applicants indicate this was "extremely important" or "very important" in their decision to apply to ATP. Another 33 percent report that it was "somewhat important."

FIGURE 1. Importance of Factors for Why Companies Apply to ATP
FIGURE 1. Importance of Factors for Why Companies Apply to ATP
[Descriptive link for Figure 1]

Single company applicants are more likely to emphasize the need for funding as the factor for applying to ATP, while joint venture applicants are more likely to emphasize the need to facilitate collaboration among organizations

  • Lack of internal funding. 60 percent of Single Company applicants indicate that unavailability of internal company funding was "extremely important" in their decision to apply to ATP, compared to 39 percent for Joint Venture applicants. (See Figure 2.)
  • Provides stability of funding. 47 percent of Single Company applicants indicate that stability of project funding was "extremely important" in their decision to apply to ATP, compared to 29 percent for Joint Venture applicants.
  • Facilitates collaboration. 38 percent of Joint Venture applicants indicate that facilitating collaboration among different organizations was "extremely important" in their decision to apply to ATP, compared to 15 percent for Single Company applicants.

FIGURE 2. Importance of Factors for Why Companies Apply to ATP:
                     Single Company versus Joint Venture Applicants

FIGURE 2. Importance of Factors for Why Companies Apply to ATP:   Single Company versus Joint Venture Applicants
[Descriptive link for Figure 2]

Return to Table of Contents or go to Factsheet 2.

Date created: June 24, 2003
Last updated: August 2, 2005

Return to ATP Home Page

ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov  / Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov.

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department
Privacy policy / Security Notice / Accessibility Statement / Disclaimer / Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) /
No Fear Act Policy / NIST Information Quallity Standards / ExpectMore.gov (performance of federal programs)

Return to NIST Home Page
Return to ATP Home Page Return to NIST Home Page Go to the NIST Home Page