NIST Advanced Technology Program
Return to ATP Home Page
ATP Historical Award Statistics Business Reporting System Surveys EAO Economic Studies and Survey Results ATP Factsheets ATP Completed Projects Status Reports EAO Home Page
Cover:  R-5 ATP Helps Companies Work with Universities

R-5 ATP Helps Companies Work with Universities

Research collaboration benefits both companies and  universities. Universities contribute new ideas as well as fundamental research understanding. Companies provide an opportunity to shape innovative ideas into practical industrial applications. Through its cost-shared funding, the Advanced Technology Program (ATP) encourages research and development (R&D) collaboration among companies, and with other organizations such as universities, as a means to achieve broader or more complex R&D goals. Evidence from the Survey of ATP Applicants 2002 shows that ATP fosters  collaboration between companies and universities.

Respondents were asked to estimate:

a) The degree to which their project was based on university research
b) Whether their project depended on technology licensed from a university
c) How critical university involvement was to their project
d) How critical university involvement was to their proposed ATP project, as compared to a typical R&D project at their company


Almost two-thirds of ATP applicants proposed projects that were based on university research

  • Three out of five applicants proposed projects that were based on university research to at least some degree. This is almost identical to the distribution found with respect to the year 2000 applicants.
  • By ATP technology area, the share of applicants reporting that their proposed project was based on university research to a “large” or “moderate” degree is as follows: Biotechnology, 40%; Electronics, 34%; Information Technology, 33%; Materials and Chemistry, 33%. The percentage for applicants in the Electronics area is significantly higher than it was for the year 2000 (23%).

Nearly one in five ATP applicants proposed projects that depend on technology licensed from a university

  • 19% of applicants proposed projects that depend on technology licensed from a university. This figure is almost identical to what was found for the year 2000 applicants.
  • Applicants in the Biotechnology field are more likely to propose projects that depend on technology licensed from a university, compared to companies in other technology areas. By technology field, the share of applicants that reported their proposed project depended on technology licensed from a university is as follows: Biotechnology, 36%; Electronics, 19%; Materials and Chemistry, 13%; Information Technology, 11%. (See Figure 1.) This pattern of findings is similar to that for the year 2000 applicants.

Figure 1 - ATP Applicants with Proposed Projects Based on University License, by Technology Area

Figure 1 - ATP Applicants with Proposed Projects Based on University License, by Technology Area

Many ATP applicants report that university involvement was critical to their proposed projects

  • 42% say university involvement was critical, but this is less than was found for the year 2000 when 51% of applicants reported it was critical for their project.1
  • By technology field, the percentage of applicants reporting that university involvement was “very critical” to their proposed project is as follows: Biotechnology, 26%; Electronics, 16%; Information Technology, 15%; Materials and Chemistry, 10%. The percentage of applicants in the Electronics area saying that university involvement was critical to their project was significantly less than was found for applicants in this area for the year 2000 (31%).

Joint Venture applicants were most likely to submit proposals for which university involvement was more critical than for typical R&D projects at their companies

  • 29% of applicants proposed projects where university involvement was said to be more critical than for a typical R&D project at the company. Another 20% indicated that the university involvement was less critical for the proposed project, and the remaining 51% said that it was about as critical as for a typical project at the
    company.2
  • Joint Venture applicants were more likely than Single Company applicants to propose projects for which university involvement was said to be more critical than for a typical R&D project at the company. (See Figure 2.)

Figure 2 - Views as to How Critical University Involvement Is for Proposed ATP Project Relative to a Typical R&D Project at the Company: Single Company versus Joint Venture Applicants

Figure 2 - Views as to How Critical University Involvement Is for Proposed ATP Project Relative to a Typical R&D Project at the Company: Single Company versus Joint Venture Applicants Figure 2 - Views as to How Critical University Involvement Is for Proposed ATP Project Relative to a Typical R&D Project at the Company: Single Company versus Joint Venture Applicants

Companies seeking to partner with the Advanced Technology Program (ATP) submit proposals to the ATP. Proposals must be for the development of innovative technologies that could not obtain private funding due to the high technical risk and that have the potential to produce widespread benefits to the economy and society. Proposals are evaluated for technical and economic merit in a rigorous competitive review process.

Return to Table of Contents or go to next factsheet in Portfolio.

Date created: July 22, 2005
Last updated: August 11, 2005

Return to ATP Home Page

ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov  / Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov.

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department
Privacy policy / Security Notice / Accessibility Statement / Disclaimer / Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) /
No Fear Act Policy / NIST Information Quallity Standards / ExpectMore.gov (performance of federal programs)

Return to NIST Home Page
Return to ATP Home Page Return to NIST Home Page Go to the NIST Home Page