Survey of ATP Applicants 2002

NIST GCR 05-876
June 2005

The Advanced Technology Program's Economic Assessment Office is pleased to present a portfolio of its most recent survey results.  Our portfolio includes two pockets of inserts (left and right) featuring customer satisfaction survey results from our 2002 applicants.

Left Pocket

• L1—Applicant Satisfaction with ATP Staff [View PDF]
• L2—Time and Cot for ATP Proposal Preparation [View PDF]
• L3—ATP Proposal Debriefing:  Nonawardee Views [View PDF]
• L4—Applicant Perceptions of the ATP Proposal Process [View PDF]
• L5—Applicant Views of the ATP Proposal Preparation Kit and Electronic Submission System (ESS) [View PDF]
• L6—Applicant Views of the Usefulness of ATP Information Resources [View PDF]

Right Pocket

• R1—Funding Sources for Innovation R&D [View PDF]
• R2—ATP Awards Attract Additional Funding [View PDF]
• R3—What Happens to Nonfunded Projects? [View PDF]
• R4—Why Do Companies Apply for ATP Funding? [View PDF]
• R5—ATP Helps Companies Work with Universities [View PDF]
• R6—ATP Fosters New R&D Directions and Partnerships [View PDF]
• R7—ATP Funds High-Risk and Long-Term R&D Projects [View PDF]
• R8—ATP Promotes Public Benefits and Knowledge Diffusion [View PDF]
• R9—Descriptive Statistics for ATP Applicants:  Company Size and R&D Effort [View PDF]
• R10—Survey of ATP Applicants 2002:  Methodolody and Respondent Characteristics [View PDF]

Date created:  July 23, 2005
Last updated: November 3, 2006