|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Competition
(98-07) Selective-Membrane Platforms:
|
| NOTE: From 1994-1998, the bulk of ATP funding was applied to specific focused program areasmulti-year efforts aimed at achieving specific technology and business goals as defined by industry. ATP revised its competition model in 1999 and opened Competitions to all areas of technology. For more information on previously funded ATP Focused Programs, visit our website at http://www.atp.nist.gov/atp/focusprg.htm. |
| Michael
Walsh TEL 301-975-5455 FAX 301-548-1087 michael.walsh@nist.gov |
Dr.
John J. Pelegrino TEL 303-497-3416 FAX 303-497-5259 jjp@bldrdoc.gov |
Selective-Membrane Platforms was created, in response to industry, to stimulate U.S. industry-academe-government partnerships for the technologically challenging R&D for agile and robust, high-selectivity/high-throughput, membrane-based separations technologies. Advances in separations technologies are needed to support more simple, efficient, safe, environmentally-benign, and economic manufacturing routes to high performance products in areas as diverse as pharmaceuticals and medical diagnostics, automobile parts, consumer electronics, and clothing. The program will leverage the R&D investment required for a combination of material science and manufacturing technology advances, and will bring together vertically-integrated teams including knowledge providers, technology developers, engineering companies, and chemicals manufacturers (including specialty, pharmaceutical, and intermediates). The goal of this program is a group of membrane platforms, i.e., families of membrane materials and modules that have broad ranging applicability (including difficult and high-value-added separations). The platforms developed during this program should also diffuse into many other applications, including commodities and petroleum refining. Individual projects should provide visible demonstrations of successful "real world" applications that will lower the hurdle rate for subsequent installations of related, efficient membrane technologies across the chemical and allied industries -- delivering added value to the combined $1.2 trillion value chains.
The word "separations" identifies a core process operation used in the chemical and petrochemical process industries to purify intermediate feedstocks that are critical for the sustained growth and competitiveness of most manufacturing industries. Advanced separations technology in the chemical and allied industries will supply product value-chains that include:
Although the U.S. chemical process industry (CPI) showed $372.3 billion in revenues in 1996, including a $18.0 billion balance of foreign trade, (1) much of its output stream is not obvious to the consumer. It is through applications like those mentioned above that the CPI impacts our daily lives, and also supports the downstream innovations of other existing ATP focused programs .
The historic separations paradigm in the CPI has been based on simple equilibrium processes, primarily low selectivity, high-energy cost distillation. Although distillation is critical to the production of commodity chemicals, it provides too low a degree of selectivity for many emerging specialty chemicals applications, and its reliance on phase change (usually at elevated temperature) makes it intrinsically unsuitable for others. During the 1994-1995 time frame when an ATP "separations" focused program was first being formulated, industry indicated a strong and coherent need for breakthrough R&D efforts to produce mass separating agents (2) for the separation of materials with similar physical properties, or the concentration or removal of products or impurities from dilute aqueous or air borne streams. These new agents would need to be reliable in extreme environments (e.g., extremes in temperature, pressure, pH, or corrosivity), or deployable in hybrid processes (e.g., combining reaction and separation into a single unit operation). Since 1995 there has been continued support from the CPI and associated trade groups toward the development of an ATP focused program in separations.
Separations issues also pose critical technology barriers to the emerging biochemical process industry, which is poised at a threshold-of-ability to expand the value and impact of the U.S. chemicals industry. Whether through the use of fermentation or other enzymatic catalysts, new and efficient processes to alternative fuels (e.g., ethanol), chemical feedstocks (e.g., 1,3 propandiol for non-toxic antifreeze and novel polyester fibers), specialty chemicals (e.g., lactic acid for biodegradable packaging films), and custom chemicals (e.g., chiral intermediates for ethical drugs with fewer side effects) will depend on advanced separations technologies with high throughput and molecular selectivity in order to be economically viable in downstream applications.
A major milestone in establishing the current program scope and urgency was the Council for Chemical Research NICHE Conference 1997 Advanced Separations Technology, organized by participants from industry, academe, and government, and attended by a broad cross-section of industry and technology developers. It was at this meeting that industry put the challenge to ATP: create an initiative in highly-selective, membrane-based separations technologies that would finally catalyze the acceptance of membranes in core process operations of the specialty and commodity chemicals industry. Selective-Membrane Platforms is in direct response to this industry challenge.
Technology objectives. Although there is a wealth of innovative academic research on highly selective membrane materials, there are few examples of their implementation in the production of commercially important chemicals due to industry concerns over membrane reliability in real-world applications. In terms of technology objectives, individual projects in this focused program are anticipated to deliver step-change improvements in membrane performance, resulting in:
Business objectives. The business objectives of candidate projects should be to deliver specialty chemicals that will:
Program objectives. Beyond the results of individual projects, the program objectives of Selective-Membrane Platforms are to:
Why ATP. The vision of Selective-Membrane Platforms is to use a focused ATP technology development initiative to leverage the past research investments (private and public) in an academic-industry-government partnership to develop breakthrough-platform, membrane-based technologies that will be proven at pilot or pre-commercial scale. Such developments will significantly lower the technology-related barriers to industry acceptance of membrane approaches to core-process separations operations. ATP involvement in this area is critical because:
Program Implementation. Since it is anticipated that most proposals will come from newly-forming joint ventures, a (non-obligatory) pre-proposal process will be used to stimulate potential proposing groups to solidify their ideas and divide responsibilities early. This process was found highly useful in organizing and strengthening joint ventures applying to the 1997 ATP focused program Technologies for the Integration of Manufacturing Applications. Although submission of pre-proposals will not be mandatory, feedback will be given promptly on degree of apparent technical risk; conformity to the concept of technology-platform development and impact on future acceptance of membranes in industrial applications; potential for broad-based benefits; business and commercialization plans; and organizational structure and commitment.
Although applications from "single applicants" will be equally considered, the minimum expectation of this solicitation is to leverage ATP funding to support five to seven "joint-venture" projects to move specific, high-selectivity membrane materials from proven laboratory feasibility through pilot scale performance testing. A typical project might be of order $3.0 million per year, extend over four to five years, and provide over 50% cost-match.
The pathways to all consumer products rely on creating specific organizations of predominantly carbon (C) and hydrogen (H) and some nitrogen (N) and oxygen (O). For example, the petrochemical industry produces the mixtures of Cn hydrocarbons found in oil fields, separates the C2 fraction from the higher- and lower-Cn fractions, and then further separates ethane from ethylene. The chemical process industry (CPI) then carefully adds N and O, for example, to make acrylonitrile monomer that is polymerized to make polymer resins. These polymer resins are then further processed in downstream manufacturing facilities to make the components for final assembly into consumer goods, such as acrylonitrile fiber as the starting point for carbon fibers used in composites for aircraft and bicycles among other applications. Other intermediate chemicals are also continually being developed for future products, such as, automotive-dash fascia and bumpers for next generation vehicles and solid polymer electrolytes for lightweight, high power density batteries used in portable electronics.
The CPI plays a critical role in directing the important chemical transformations and separating/purifying the desired products from a complex matrix of unreacted feedstock, by-products, and waste. In this role, the CPI's position in the value chain lies between the upstream technology developers who have the knowledge and tools to develop new separations/process paradigms, and the downstream product manufacturers who capture most of the added value. Examples of downstream product areas are:
Critical advanced materials for the aerospace industry include carbon-carbon and carbon-epoxy composites. Economical access to ultra-pure acrylonitrile would enable the manufacture of ultra-thin carbon fibers for the creation of stronger/lighter weight composites for airframes and aircraft brake pads.
Industry need. U.S. manufacturers in all industry sectors are looking for routes to higher-performance or lower-cost products to sustain their competitive position in the global marketplace. These routes will be founded on new separations materials and processes in the CPI that will enable the creation of:
High performance processes such as a permselective membrane supporting a dehydrogenation catalyst to simultaneously form desired products and remove the by-product hydrogen. Thus the reaction can proceed to higher yield and achieve superior economics.
To achieve industry acceptance, any new separation platform must provide significant processing cost reductions by:
The ability of the CPI to meet these emergent demands for high-performance, low-cost products rests on their ability to "find" separating agents compatible with appropriate reaction processes and reliable under real-world operating conditions. Today this is generally accomplished by contract research to technology developers. However, in this scenario, the CPI shoulders both the technology risk (i.e., if the new separating agents fail) and the market risk (i.e., that the new or improved chemical feedstock will not provide the downstream manufacturers with the anticipated economic advantage) without a corresponding share of the added value introduced by these high performance specialty chemicals.
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. The world leader a decade ago, the U.S. CPI is threatened by four external forces:
The future sustainability of the CPI has been weakened by the decade-long trend toward down sizing in its corporate research efforts. Although currently spending approximately $12 billion on R&D, research has been moved into business units with short term, product improvement foci, and development efforts redirected toward customer service. The research arm of many companies today consists of a small group of technology watchers who advise operating units on very specific short term projects. Alongside the cuts in R&D staffing, reductions in capital budgets force any incremental process development to be aligned with existing, fully-depreciated equipment. Although this trend has not been significantly reversed, innovators in the CPI are now turning to partnerships with industry-sponsored university centers of excellence, small technology developers, and independent research organizations and national laboratories to meet their longer-term R&D needs. Despite the leveraged research funding from NSF, DOE, EPA, DOD, and the federal SBIR programs, industry's focus on specific niche problems and their shotgun approach to technology development does not significantly further the general acceptance of membranes in core-process separations operations.
The strongest long-term position of the U.S. CPI is in specialty chemicals. (4) In the global chemical industry, approximately 95% of production mass is commodity chemicals (where margins are measured in pennies per kilogram and labor, energy, and capital costs play a key role in competitiveness). However, approximately 30% of industry profit is provided by the about five-mass-percent that is specialty products. These are high value-added chemicals with market growth driven by developments in the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, semiconductor, paper, and plastics industries.
Consider, as an example, Asia's rapidly-modernizing economy which today consumes one-third of the world's plastics production. Chemical producers worldwide are planning new plants in Asia to provide the high-purity and high-performance monomers demanded by these rapidly growing economies. However, to capture these opportunities U.S. chemicals firms need competitive technologies. For example, to an outsider the timing of the 1995 $1 Million Monsanto Challenge coincided with a desire for improved separations technology for the recovery (for reuse) of mixed organic compounds, salts, and acids from the process streams in a world-class acrylonitrile plant (i.e., the starting point of a polymeric-fiber value chain) for China. It is possible that the loss of the recent bid was partially due to the high unit cost associated with their current technology, the lack of availability of an improved process, and their corporate standards of behavior and technology. (5) There are two important ramifications of this outcome:
As emerging foreign specialty chemicals manufacturers adopt new separations technologies in green-field plants, U.S. manufacturers will find it more difficult to compete. This threat to the prominence of the U.S. chemicals industry is exacerbated by:
The historic separations paradigm in the CPI has been complex, high energy cost distillation columns, but the high temperatures and low selectivity of distillation make it intrinsically unsuitable for many specialty intermediates. Chromatographic resins offer high molecular selectivity, but have limited applicability in high-throughput applications. Although new membrane materials are beginning to have the required selectivity and show potential for high-throughput applications, they do not have a proven reliability in CPI applications. (6)
A major point made at the Council for Chemical Research NICHE Conference 1997 Advanced Separations Technology was that there are few examples of membrane implementation in commercially important commodity and specialty chemical applications due to substantial technical (e.g., membrane selectivity and reliability) and non-technical barriers. No one in the U.S. chemical process industry wants to be the first to replace functional unit operations with an "unreliable" membrane system -- they would all like to be second. Broad deployment of membrane-based systems in the areas of industrial gas purification (e.g., nitrogen for cryogenic and inerting applications; oxygen-enriched air for welding and metal processing) and solids recovery (small scale dairy and electroplating applications) are strong indications of industry's willingness to rapidly adopt successful new technologies where there are no viable alternatives.
A wealth of technological innovation was presented to ATP through white papers and workshops, and can be independently measured by patent and publications activities -- the level of innovation within the membrane research community is very high. Between 1990 and 1997 the PTO database yields 2542 patents issued for membranes. The number of research papers published in just the Journal of Membrane Science has increased exponentially over the past 5 years (with a doubling period of 2 years). Based on a cursory overview, some 20% of these patents and publications would fall into categories within the high-selectivity paradigm of Selective-Membrane Platforms.
Other points to be noted are the significant number of technical meetings that are either completely devoted to membrane science and technology (e.g., North American, European and Japanese membrane societies have yearly meetings) or have a significant number of sessions on that topic area (e.g., American Institute of Chemical Engineers and American Chemical Society). Technology development in this area is truly competitive. In addition to work at all major universities around the world, there are many government or government-industry-academe partnerships pursuing separations technology that is membrane-based.
Nearly every major chemical and petroleum corporation has a separations group, and many research universities now have major industry- and government-funded separations programs (e.g., the Separations Research Program at the University of Texas, Austin and the Center for Separation Using Thin Films at the University of Colorado, Boulder) -- however, the academic work is often far removed from commercialization and the industry work is often focused on incremental improvement for specific applications.
Program scope. Based on input from 50-plus industry white papers, several ATP-sponsored workshops on separations, and industry- and professional association-sponsored meetings there appears to be broad consensus on industry's need for the following innovative membrane-based technology platforms -- new membrane materials or process conditions that will provide substantial improvements over current selectivity-speed capabilities.
Proprietary examples of each of the above mentioned families of membrane innovation exist. Their technology development status ranges from proof of feasibility, to bench scale prototype, to proven small-scale applications. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few examples of such innovation currently deployed in a commercial U.S. application for the manufacture of specialty or commodity chemicals. (8)
Examples of "enabling" technology. Each family of novel membrane "systems" mentioned above represents a breakthrough technology platform. If the materials and manufacturing challenges can be solved for a lead application, there are potential platform extensions that will leverage this base-technology development in related separations challenges, for example:
New antibiotics and therapeutics are being identified from novel drug discovery processes, including combinatorial chemistry techniques. The synthesis approaches are not limited to the traditional fermentation techniques but will include traditional organic synthesis approaches as well. In order to simultaneously overcome reaction equilibrium limitations and the expense and complexity of multiple liquid-liquid solvent extraction steps a membrane reactor/separator can be considered. The membrane needs to be solvent resistant, inert to the redox reaction species, and very selective because multiple steps each need high recovery (e.g., in a 48 step synthesis, 98% yield at each step results in a total yield of less than 40%).
In funding projects aimed at overcoming the technical challenges associated with these ideas, ATP would require that the proposed solutions include the development of a reliability-proven platform technology that could be adapted (e.g., by modifying the incorporated agents) for superior, cost-effective solutions to pervasive separations problems shared by the chemical, petroleum, mining and metal finishing, pulp and paper, semiconductor processing, food, agrochemical, and biochemical processing industries. The development of such selective-membrane based platforms will allow process industry engineers to choose appropriate solutions to provide more effective routes to product and profit, and ensure broad technological impact. The recently implemented Separations Tool Advisory (developed as a part of the Clean Process Advisory System of the AIChE Center for Waste Reduction Technologies) will provide a mechanism to make information about these emerging separations processes and related product design data broadly available to design engineers and end users.
Separation issues are critical at all stages in moving from raw materials to final products with the highest value at a minimum of cost, and with a minimum of impact to the air, water, and land that industry shares as part of the larger society. Separations processes can constitute up to 90% of the processing costs in the biotechnology industry, especially for high-value pharmaceutical products, and 40%-70% of capital and operating costs in high-volume chemicals applications; and control the creation of high-performance products that are dependent on feedstock availability, purity, or cost for their competitive edge. Users of specialty-separation technologies include the electronics, metal finishing, pharmaceutical, plastics & rubber, health care, food and beverage, and biotechnology industries. Users of high-volume-separation technologies include the basic process industries: chemicals, agrochemicals, pulp & paper, water purification, extraction industries, and oil refining (petroleum) -- industries that provide the downstream manufacturing sectors with industrial feedstocks. Together, these two user groups of separation technologies represent about $1.2 trillion in product shipments and over $500 billion in value-added to the U.S. economy. (9)
Partnerships. An ATP focus program in membrane separations will accelerate economic growth by fostering the formation of multi-disciplinary teams, typically including an academic innovator, a small business technology developer, a system integrator, and a major chemical or pharmaceutical manufacturer to share the risk in speeding new technology to large scale; and by encouraging partnering between separation-technology developers and end-users to create new value-added markets.
Potential contributors to the vertically integrated partnerships anticipated by Selective-Membrane Platforms might include:
| Knowledge Provider | Technology Developer | Systems Integrator | Chemical Manufacturer | End-user | Consumer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| university, small business, IRO, national lab | small-to-large business, national lab | construction and engineering firm | high-volume producer, small specialty company | pharmaceutical, small-part manufacturer | work, home, health recreation |
Business goals. The program focus on core-process applications guarantees that the new-platform technology solutions developed under this initiative will be applicable to a broad cross-cut of industries. Direct impact on the U.S. economy will be measured by the reduction in unit costs (i.e., raw material, energy, capital, operating and disposal) and increase in production capacity; and by the creation of new markets based on new- and high-performance materials. Indirect benefits in areas of enhanced environmental quality are also anticipated. The aim of Selective-Membrane Platforms is to develop breakthrough separations-technology platforms that push beyond the current efficiency frontier (the existing tradeoff relationship between selectivity and productivity) for a variety of processes. In this section we try to define "breakthrough performance" in terms of suitable business goals of candidate proposals.
High performance products. New- and higher-purity products produced by the chemical industry can open new markets and enhance the performance of products manufactured by customers in the electronics, optics, and health care industries.
High performance processes that reduce processing costs per unit product by 20%-50%. Although this goal might be reached through: improved capacity, utilization of lower quality feedstocks or raw materials, reduced energy consumption, and lower pollution abatement costs, given the large size (capital investment) of chemical process plants and relatively cheap energy costs in the U.S. today, significant cost reductions for existing plants will generally be achieved through increases in capacity:
Achieving these business goals will have secondary economic benefits through the sales or licensing of U.S. technology to countries expanding their chemical, petroleum, pulp and paper, mining and metals finishing, and food and beverage manufacturing sectors; through the generation of spin-off separation technologies usable in consumer markets; and through the exportation of advanced environmental technologies into the rapidly growing $150 billion world-wide market for water and air pollution control technologies. (13)
Membrane-market segmentation. Although markets are often segmented by application (pharmaceutical vs potable water), media (air, aqueous & organic solvent), and materials (inorganic vs polymer) there are about 50 U.S. companies involved in the $2.5 billion worldwide market for membrane materials and modules.
The material and manufacturing costs of the separating agents (i.e., the membrane itself) represent about 30% of the cost of a membrane module. Sales of full membrane-based operating systems are currently in the $4 billion range, and are projected to grow to over $10 billion by 2000 (the added value from the system developer is of order 2.5-fold to 5-fold the value of the membrane and/or module).
U.S. Sales of Membranes and Modules ($ million)(14)
| Application | 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | % Annual Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gas Separations | 51 | 85 | 125 | 185 | 8 |
| Pervaporation | 1 | 28 | 61 | 135 | 17 |
| Electrochemical | 22 | 31 | 57 | 105 | 13 |
| Food/Beverage | 64 | 92 | 134 | 197 | 8 |
| Semiconductor (POU) | 87 | 120 | 181 | 271 | 8 |
| Water--Municipal; Pharmaceutical | 62 | 102 | 160 | 256 | 9 |
| Biotech/Biomed | 123 | 195 | 370 | 675 | 13 |
| Total | 588 | 927 | 1,462 | 2,344 | 9.7 |
Incorporating affinity agents into membrane platforms will provide a substantial opportunity to establish a leadership position in serving the rapidly growing specialty chemicals markets, and to expand markets currently being supplied at low production capacity by highly selective chromatography resins. High-selectivity membrane materials are in an initial growth phase of their life cycle, and competition in developing and marketing new separating systems is increasing in intensity -- driven by the increased industry need for purer processes stream inputs and product.
New-industry creation. Development of the membrane-based systems included in Selective-Membrane Platforms will be critical for moving the emerging biochemical process industry beyond small scale, high-value pharmaceuticals into the realm of specialty or even commodity chemicals. ATP is currently funding a joint venture undertaking a bioengineering approach to industrially-important specialty chemicals. There is heated global competition in the field of their primary target, and product separation and purification is a critical component of cost competitiveness -- influencing both process costs and capital facility costs. Cost-effective technology capable of dealing with their product/waste stream matrix, at their projected production volumes and purification/recovery levels was not available at the start of this project. In the joint venture effort, the development of this technology component is being led by a small-business, technology-development partner. This emerging separations-technology platform is anticipated to have many related applications in the recovery and purification of fermentation-based specialty chemical intermediates, and will provide consumer value through new-or lower-cost pharmaceuticals, food additives, and specialty monomer-based products.
Fermentation processes (similar to what is done in micro breweries) are being increasingly developed for the synthesis of specialty and intermediate chemicals. For example, 1,3-propandiol is a versatile intermediate that is important in the specialty plastics value chain, and has potential as a non-toxic antifreeze replacement (potentially capturing a fraction of the current 2.4 billion kg U.S. production of ethylene glycol). If there were suitable membrane technologies to isolate and purify varieties of small molecules (like 1,3 propandiol) from dilute solutions at high acidity, there are enzymatic pathways that could be exploited to create the specialty-chemical equivalent to the urban micro brewery -- small scale facilities specializing in just-in-time production of high-value industrial chemicals.
Anticipating resource shortages in the future, there is a growing interest in fermentation approaches to a variety of specialty and commodity chemicals. Recovery and purification of product from fermentation reactors is best achieved by in-situ membrane techniques, i.e., as would allow the selectivepermeation of ethanol. Beyond selectivity and productivity, many anticipated processes will share similar separations issues such as fouling prevention and robustness in a high solids environment. Technologies that enable a 50% reduction in the cost of removing water from fermentation broth (to $2.50 per ton-H2O) will expand the chemicals-from-biomass industry (e.g., ethanol and organic acids) by more than $4 billion.
Selective-Membrane Platforms traces its roots to an April 1994 NIST/ATP sponsored workshop on Chemical Manufacturing for the 21st Century. At this seminal meeting representatives of the U.S. chemicals industry (an industrial sector in which separations are involved in virtually every step in the manufacturing process) stood up and indicated a need for a coherent program addressing cross-cutting separations needs. The 1994 workshop resulted in the submission of 19 industry-led white papers on technical challenges and innovations in mass separation agents. Separations and catalysis issues were the focus of an October 1994 workshop Research Opportunities in Pollution Prevention sponsored by the Council for Chemical Research and NIST's Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory. A program development workshop Separations Technologies: Challenges and Benefits was held at NIST in February 1995, attended by 81 representatives from over 45 different companies, and followed by additional industry input and white papers (for a total of 54 to date). Attendees at the separations workshop represented modelers, materials and device developers and manufacturers, and end users. Although the white papers came largely from the chemical and allied processing industries, biochemical and agrochemical processing, semiconductor processing, paper and pulp, metals and mining sectors have been represented. Separations and catalysis were the joint foci of an October 1996 ATP workshop held in Boulder, CO, and was attended by over 100 academic, industry, and government representatives.
The CCR NICHE Conference 1997 Advanced Separations Technology represents a major milestone in the definition of this program scope and degree of urgency. It was at this meeting, organized by participants from industry (Union Carbide, Dow Chemical, Exxon Research and Engineering), academe (Florida State and U Colorado), and government (DOE and NIST), and attended by a broad cross-section of industry and technology developers, that industry put the challenge to ATP: create an initiative in high-selectivity, membrane-based separations technologies that would finally catalyze the acceptance of membranes in core process operations of the specialty and commodity chemicals industry.
Industry roadmapping. Selective-Membrane Platforms has been guided by the technology roadmapping established by the 1996 report Technology Vision 2020: The Chemical Industry, issued collectively by the ACS, AIChE, CMA, CCR, and the Synthetic Organic Chemistry Manufacturers Association. Two issues germane to this focused program are constantly emphasized in Vision 2020: (15)
"Industry must accept responsibility for leading an expanded collaborative effort for industry, academe and government in research, " turning to the federal government "to help the U.S. chemical industry improve competitiveness by supporting long-term, high-risk research and development efforts."
ATP has the opportunity to implement a strong, national program in membrane-based systems for industrial applications that has been sorely needed by U.S. industry for the past decade -- to develop promising ideas to the point where they can be exploited commercially and result in lowered production costs or improved product performance. Mass separating technology has been called the "most important area of high technical risk requiring new innovation, and the area of chemical manufacturing where significant cost savings can be realized." (16) The role of ATP is to spur the development of enabling new materials, processes and manufacturing technology.
In the decade since a Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology recommendation that the two most important generic research goals in separation science are to develop highly selective agents that can discriminate among chemically similar species in a readily reversible process, and to focus on processes and agents to selectively "pluck out" solutes from dilute solutions, there have been no coherent federally funded programs focused on improving selectivity in separations or in separations from dilute streams -- let alone a program aimed at industrial applications of these technologies. Where federal funding exists, it is often channeled into in-house programs such as were funded out of the Bureau of Reclamation (about $12 million in funding, constant between 1986 and 1995) or to basic research projects such as funded by NSF (about $6.0 million, including bioseparations) and DOE (about $32 million, excluding isotopes and coal research), most of which goes to universities and national laboratories. In FY98 DOE plans an initiative that will include a small amount of funding for industry-led research in separations technologies (i.e., catalysis, bioprocessess, separations technologies, and computational fluid dynamics will share $5 million in first-year funding).
R&D funding within the chemical industry has been flat over the last decade, currently around 4% of sales, or $12 billion. Despite, or perhaps because separations unit operations represent a significant fraction of capital and operating expenses within the chemical industry, the increased "competitiveness driven" priority of short-term profitability has resulted in a dramatic decrease in investments in the development of new separations processes -- with a focusing of R & D efforts on incremental improvements in specific separations approaches that convey discernible short term results. Although chemical manufacturers have shown a willingness to implement major materials and processing advances when proven to be cost effective (e.g., recent advances to improve product capacity have included rotary bed continuous ion-exchange systems), industry finds it increasingly difficult to justify allocating resources for longer-term, high risk projects even though they might hold the promise of technological discontinuity.
Partnering with the ATP has had an effect on shifting the technology portfolio balance of the chemical processing industry. During the past few years ATP issued 10 awards for high-risk R&D projects of broadly enabling, innovative work in mass separating agents, with demonstrated benefit to the U.S. economy through project-specific applications. These projects included applications of new high-selectivity membranes and sorbents materials, some of them in hybrid systems or under hostile process conditions. The average statistics for these awards were project lengths of 3.1 years and funding levels of $5.2 million, of which the average industry-cost share was 54%. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Broad-based solutions to these technical challenges would otherwise not be created by the private sector due to the problem-specific focus of industry -- however, it is in cross cutting applications that this technology has the highest potential for stimulating commercial innovation. Due to increased international competition, environmental regulations, and depleted natural resources the next decade will be critical. Selective-Membrane Platforms will bring chemical manufacturers, technology developers, academe and national laboratories, and manufacturing end users together to move the chemical process industry and all of its downstream customers into the 21st century.
1. "Facts and Figures for the Chemical Industry," Chemical & Engineering
News June 23, 1997, p. 38.
2. Mass separating agents are materials or devices such as membranes,
sorbents, molecular sieves, and microbes that are added to a process stream
to enable separation based on a physical property change, or a rate or
equilibrium based partitioning. This is in contrast to many classic separation
processes that rely on a phase-change due to the addition or removal of
energy (e.g., distillation, crystallization, or drying).
3. "Separation Technologies -- Marketing Factors," J.L. Humphrey, A.F.
Seibert, and C.V. Goodpastor, DOE/ID/12920-2 (1991).
4. "Product Report on Custom Chemicals," C&EN Feb. 3, 1997. This report
defines specialty chemicals to include "fine chemicals" and "performance
chemicals," among others. Performance chemicals enhance processing or
end properties of products (e.g. plasticizer used in polymer films that
are in turn used in automobile safety glass). Fine chemicals are bought
for what they are rather than a specific function they will perform, and
sell in the range $10/kg to $100,000/kg. The total world-wide industry
is $36 Billion/year: 50% of which are made or consumed by the drug industry,
19% in agrochemicals, 6% in foods, 6% in flavors and fragrances, and 13%
in other areas including biocides.
5. 1995 Monsanto $1 Million Challenge.
6. Membranes to separate carbon dioxide from methane are commercially
available and many installations have been operating. But several new
applications that will expand the economic benefit require membranes that
are more selective and robust toward process upsets.
There are reports of large commercial installations that failed because
of unanticipated poisoning by heavier hydrocarbons (either as condensates
or vapor components). Knowledge of this experience has generated significant
risk-aversion in the petrochemical industry. Simultaneous development
of improved technology and large (successful) demonstration plants will
advance the viability and acceptance of membrane separations throughout
the industry. Howard Meyer, GRI and Tom Ratcliffe, Unocal, private communication
(1997).
7.
A "reactive membrane" project could, in principle, be submitted to
both the ATP Catalysis and Biocatalysis and the Selective-Membrane Platforms
focused program solicitations. To be "in-scope" for Selective-Membrane
Platforms, such a proposal would have to 1) show how the proposed technology
development represents an innovative separations platform and 2) how
success would increase industry acceptance of membranes in core-process
operations.
8. P. Bryan, private communication (1997).
9. U.S. Industrial Outlook 1994, U.S. Department of Commerce (1995).
10. Numbers related to specific products/processes are industry specific
and typically considered company sensitive. The numbers used in this white
paper to describe membrane markets and value chain characteristics are
aggregates derived from proprietary market studies (see reference 11)
to show typical trends in added-value. Engineering plastics in automotive
applications was chosen for exemplification because this application lies
between higher-end applications such as pharmaceuticals and lower-end
applications such as herbicides.
11.
Representative market studies include: "Inorganic Membranes: Markets,
Technologies, Players," A. Crull, BCC Report GB-112R (1994); "Inorganic
Membranes for Advanced Separations: Global Business Opportunities and
Commercial Intelligence," Technology Catalysts International Corporation
(1991); "Separation Technologies: Markets and Applications, R.F. Taylor,
Decision Resources Report R911101 (1991); "Membrane Separations Technologies,"
B. Baumgartner, Freedonia Group (1994); and "U.S. Ultrafilter, Nanofilter,
and Reverse-Osmosis Filter Elements Markets," Frost & Sullivan Report
5293-15 (1996).
12. "Top 50 Chemical Products," Chemical & Engineering
News April 8, 1996, p30.
13.
In addition to use in their core manufacturing operations, separation
technologies are fundamental to emissions reduction operations in these
industries, and in diverse service-sector businesses such as dry cleaners,
restaurants, and gas stations. Although it is not the intent of this
focused program to support the development of environmental technologies.
A proposal targeted at an environmental "killer application" would be considered
in-scope if: 1) the application were chosen based on economic benefits
to the company and the U.S. economy, 2) there were clear pathways for
platform extensions to specialty or commodity chemicals processing, and
3) success contributed substantially to the acceptance of membrane robustness
for core processing applications. World market forecasts (Industrial Outlook
1994) for the environmental industry project capital expenditures for
water treatment and air quality to grow to $125 billion by 2000 -- this
is an area that will be broadly enabled by advances in mass separating
agents, and that is dominated by small, high technology businesses. The
enabling aspects of most mass separating agents ensures that technologies
developed for core process applications will have few barriers to implementation
in pollution control applications, especially at the in-process recycle
phase. The inclusion of small-business technology developers, and system
integrators on Selective-Membrane Platforms R&D teams should facilitate
the spill-over of developing technologies into this environmental market.
14.
Anna Crull, "U.S. Membranes and Modules," Business Communications
Corporation 1995 Annual Membranes Planning Meeting.
15. "Technology
Vision 2020: The U.S. Chemical Industry, http://www.chem.purdue.edu/ccr/.
16. "Separation and Purification: Critical Needs and Opportunities," National
Research Council Committee on Separation Science and Technology, C.J.
King, Chair (National Academy Press, Washington D.C.; 1987).
Date created: November
1997
Last updated:
April 11, 2005
| ATP
website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov
/ Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department Privacy policy / Security Notice / Accessibility Statement / Disclaimer / Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) / No Fear Act Policy / NIST Information Quality Standards / ExpectMore.gov (performance of federal programs) |