NIST Advanced Technology Program
Return to ATP Home Page
Meet Our Staff Meet with ATP CLSO Staff In Your Area Search for an CLSO Funded Project New Directions E-mail comments Related Links CLSO Home Page
ATC Workshop Papers

From Cell to Production

Technical Challenges of Cloning Pigs for BioMedical Research

Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Mammals

SATACs and Transgenesis

Concerns About Gene Transfer and Nuclear Transfer in Domestic Animals

Prospects and Hurdles in Optimizing the Vascular Support of Engineered Tissues

ES Cells Make Neurons in a Dish

Application of Nuclear Transfer Technology in the Generation of Pigs for Xenetransplantation

Genomics: Delivering Cell Culture Systems for Tissue Therapy

Nuclear Transfer Technology

Gene Targeting in Domestic Species: Challenges and Opportunities

Homologous Recombination and Genetic Engineering of Transgenic Recombinant Animals

Nuclear Transplantation in the Cow: Future Challenges

Enhancing Transgenics through Cloning

ES Cells Offer is a Power Tool for Understanding the Genetic Control of Tissue Development and for Screening Potential Therapeutic Drugs

Human Germline Engineering -- The Prospects for Commercial Development

Mammalian Artificial Chromosomes for Animal Transgenesis

Understanding Developmental Abnormalities in Offspring Produced by Nuclear Transplantation

Role of Cell Cycle

Cloning and Other Reproductive Technologies for Application in Transgenics

Cell Culturing Technology as a Major Hurdle in the Commercialization of Genetically Altered Animals

    ADVANCED TRANSGENESIS AND CLONING: Genetic Manipulation in Animals
Electronic Workshop Presentation: Paper No. 08

NUCLEAR TRANSFER AND GENE TARGETING IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS: BIOREACTORS OF THE FUTURE

Participant:

    Alex J. Harvey, Ph.D.
    AviGenics

The advent of new animal transgenesis technologies will allow valuable modifications to the genome of virtually any animal. Such technologies will improve agronomic traits and will lead to the introduction of new and lower cost biopharmaceuticals and medical procedures. In the case of biopharmaceuticals, complex agents requiring post-translation modifications or complex folding are either too costly or not in sufficient quantities to meet the demand for currently available treatments and new clinical trials. Production in either mammary glands of ungulates or oviducts of avians can readily outpace the current methods of production in mammalian cell fermentors in cost, concentration, abundance and scalability. (1), (2), (3)

Currently the model system is the mammary gland of transgenic goats produced by zygotic microinjection of a DNA expression cassette. Transgenic goats can express up to 50 mg/ml of the desired exogenous protein. (4) However production of such animals is inefficient and expression levels are unpredictable. Nuclear transfer (NT) offers an appealing alternative. (5), (6) In theory, one could perform gene targeting in a cell line that is able to donate its nuclei to recipient oocytes. Ideally a cDNA which encodes the desired biopharmaceutical is inserted into a gene (knock-in approach) that drives high levels of expression of a milk protein (b-lactoglobulin or casein). The cDNA would be expressed at the highest possible levels since all of the regulatory elements of the target gene remain intact (assuming the insertion itself does not disrupt the gene).

The cost and levels of protein production in birds (i.e. chickens) rivals that of mammals and can provide an alternative for proteins that are not suitable for production in ungulates. (3) In addition, due to the short generation time and ease of breeding, chickens offer rapid and scaleable bioreactor capabilities.

Avian transgenesis lags behind that of mammals as retroviral-mediated transgenesis is still the most efficient method and microinjection is very inefficient. NT in avians poses a different set of problems, due to the large size of the yolk on which the oocyte resides. This makes manipulation of the oocyte difficult and visualization of the metaphase plate even harder. Nevertheless these limitations can be overcome.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are early embryonic cells that are able to remain totipotent after many generations in vitro and have enabled gene targeting in mice, but not in any other species. ES-like cells isolated from non-mice mammalian species and cultured for any period of time (especially after the first passage) often are able to contribute to somatic but not germline tissues, yielding low-value chimeric animals. Avian-derived ES-like cells have never been conclusively shown to contribute to somatic and germline tissues of recipient embryos. NT appears to offer a solution to this dilemma but the long-term culture of cells able to act as nuclei donors suffers the same problem.

Currently nuclei from fetal tissues serve as the best donors in mammalian NT (see (7) for review). However when cultured for the periods of time required for gene targeting, the cells lose the ability to serve as donors. Recent work in mice improved upon the efficiency of NT but the donor cells (cumulus) were not cultured. (8) Thus there may be a need to identify culture conditions that allow long term culture and gene targeting of NT donor cells. Such culture conditions may overlap with those needed for ES cells, therefore the advent of NT does not eliminate the need for development of ES cell technologies in animal transgenesis. As an alternative, new methods could be developed to target genes in the short culture times currently available.

ATP is an ideal support platform for the development of such techniques as they are indeed cutting edge, high risk and fraught with unforeseen pitfalls. The benefits of such technologies will have revolutionary impacts in the healthcare and agricultural industries as well as spur new research in all fields of biology and medicine.

1. L. Johannes, Biotech Goat is Created to Produce Drug, Wall Street Journal, April 9 1996, pp. B1, B3.

2. N. Rudolph, in Genetic Engineering News . (1997).

3. AviGenics Estimates, . (1998).

4. Genzyme Transgenics, . (1998).

5. K. H. Campbell, J. McWhir, W. A. Ritchie, I. Wilmut, Nature 380, 64-6 (1996).

6. I. Wilmut, A. E. Schnieke, J. McWhir, A. J. Kind, K. H. Campbell, Nature 385, 810-3 (1997).

7. G. B. Anderson, G. E. Seidel, Science 280, 1400-1 (1998).

8. T. Wakayama, A. C. Perry, M. Zuccotti, K. R. Johnson, R. Yanagimachi, Nature 394, 369-74 (1998).

Click here to post comments on participants' workshop paper.

Click here for PUBLIC Discussion Group

previous Return to previous workshop paper.             next Go to next workshop paper

DOOR Return to ATC's Main Page

Return to ATP Home Page ATP website comments: webmaster-atp@nist.gov   /  Technical ATP inquiries: InfoCoord.ATP@nist.gov.

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department
Privacy policy / Security Notice / Accessibility Statement / Disclaimer / Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) /
No Fear Act Policy / NIST Information Quallity Standards / ExpectMore.gov (performance of federal programs)
Return to NIST Home Page
Return to ATP Home Page Return to NIST Home Page Go to NIST Home Page