|
ATC Workshop Papers
From Cell to Production
Technical Challenges of Cloning Pigs for BioMedical
Research
Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Mammals
SATACs and Transgenesis
Concerns About Gene Transfer and Nuclear Transfer
in Domestic Animals
ES Cells Make Neurons in a Dish
Nuclear Transfer and Gene Targeting in Domestic
Animals: Bioreactors of the Future
Application of Nuclear Transfer Technology
in the Generation of Pigs for Xenetransplantation
Genomics: Delivering Cell Culture Systems
for Tissue Therapy
Nuclear Transfer Technology
Gene Targeting in Domestic Species: Challenges
and Opportunities
Homologous Recombination and Genetic Engineering
of Transgenic Recombinant Animals
Nuclear Transplantation in the Cow: Future
Challenges
Enhancing Transgenics through Cloning
ES Cells Offer is a Power Tool for Understanding
the Genetic Control of Tissue Development and for Screening Potential
Therapeutic Drugs
Human Germline Engineering -- The Prospects
for Commercial Development
Mammalian Artificial Chromosomes for Animal
Transgenesis
Understanding Developmental Abnormalities
in Offspring Produced by Nuclear Transplantation
Role of Cell Cycle
Cloning and Other Reproductive Technologies
for Application in Transgenics
Cell Culturing Technology as a Major Hurdle
in the Commercialization of Genetically Altered Animals
|
| ADVANCED TRANSGENESIS AND
CLONING: Genetic Manipulation in Animals
Electronic Workshop Presentation: Paper
No. 06
PROSPECTS AND HURDLES IN OPTIMIZING
THE VASCULAR SUPPORT OF ENGINEERED TISSUES
Participant:
Robert L. Gendron, Ph.D.
Division of Hematology and Oncology
Childrens Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati Ohio 45229-3039
One of the major impediments to the successful
engineering of replacement tissues for grafting and organ repair is
the adequate vascularization of the new tissue. New blood vessels
are necessary to support the health and homeostasis of tissue grafts.
Moreover, the capillary network supporting engineered tissues could
be used to deliver growth factors or drugs to the tissue itself. The
identification of molecular switches regulating the formation and
growth of blood vessel capillaries (vasculogenesis and angiogenesis)
is a necessary step for designing new practical strategies for optimizing
graft neovascularization and/or for maintaining the endogenous vascular
network in grafted or engineered tissue. Key regulatory molecules
controlling the growth and differentiation of capillaries could be
targeted using peptidomimetics or exogenous genes to optimize the
controlled growth of a supportive blood vessel network in new tissues.
However, there is first a need for studying in detail the cells giving
rise to capillaries and the genes controlling the signaling pathways
making the different endothelia compatible with their destined tissue
environments.
Our perspective on this problem has involved an initial focus of
generating in vitro model systems of vascular differentiation which
are also useful in vivo. We have generated a clonal mouse embryonic
endothelial cell line (IEM) by immortalizing the differentiated
derivatives of mouse embryonic stem cells. The IEM cells respond
to leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and basic fibroblast growth
factor (bFGF) by forming capillary structures in vitro . In vivo,
the cytokine treated IEM cells can chimerize developing vascular
structures without disrupting development, but do so in a tissue
restricted manner (1,2). Recently, Hatzopoulos et al. have also
reported that cloned mouse embryonic endothelial cells can integrate
normally into specific developing vascular structures (3). Furthermore,
the ability of human endothelial progenitor cells to integrate into
sites of tissue injury has also recently been reported (4). We surmised
that their ability to differentiate into capillaries and to chimerize
vascular structures makes IEM a useful model system to isolate and
study the effects of genes which might alter the fate of endothelial
stem cells in vivo. We are now using the IEM cells for identifying
and studying new genes which might be key switches in controlling
capillary growth and differentiation. The products of these genes
could potentially be utilized to optimize the growth of blood vessel
networks in artificially generated or grafted tissues.
We have recently isolated a novel regulatory gene from undifferentiated
IEM cells named tubedown-1 (tbdn-1). Transcripts of this gene are
expressed highly in undifferentiated endothelial cells and become
downregulated as endothelial cells differentiate into capillaries.
Tbdn-1 encodes a 700 amino acid protein with motifs predicting a
role in chromatin remodeling. Inhibition of tbdn-1 expression by
overexpression of antisense cDNA indicates that tbdn-1 may act as
a negative regulator of capillary differentiation in IEM cells.
If tbdn-1 can alter the growth and differentiation of endothelia
in vivo, the tbdn-1 product may be a useful candidate with which
to manipulate and remodel capillary networks in artificially engineered
tissues. Experiments to test the role tbdn-1 plays in capillary
growth in vivo are underway in our laboratory.
Two major technical hurdles slow our current ability to practically
manipulate the blood vessel support of organ grafts and engineered
tissues. The first is a lack of knowledge of the biology of endothelial
stem cells and the differences in endothelia from different tissue
sources. What biological attributes make endothelial stem cells
developmentally plastic? At what developmental stage should endothelial
stem cells be isolated to optimize their ability to integrate into
and support engineered tissues? Are endothelial stem cells "generic";
or are there phenotypic differences in endothelia? Our work and
the work of others has begun to address some of the features of
endothelial progenitor cells but a more complete study of the biology
of endothelial stem cells is required to make their successful isolation
and consistent usefulness in tissue engineering a reality. The second
technical hurdle facing this field is our lack of a complete understanding
of the molecular events controlling the growth and differentiation
of endothelia. What downstream regulatory proteins control the angiogenic
signals stimulated by cytokines such as bFGF and vascular endothelial
growth factor (VEGF)? Could such proteins be mimicked or blocked
with drugs in order to remodel the vascular tree in a graft? These
hurdles will be overcome as we learn more about endothelial stem
cells by studying additional endothelial progenitor cell lines and
by exploring the properties of the molecules regulating their growth
and differentiation. We have isolated a potentially important candidate
molecule that may control capillary formation using IEM cells. However,
understanding how such molecules fit into the signaling pathways
controlling the growth and differentiation of blood vessels requires
further study before they can be used practically.
- Gendron, R.L., Tsai, F.-Y., Paradis, H. and Arceci, R.J. Induction
of Embryonic Vasculogenesis by bFGF and LIF in vitro and in vivo.
Dev. Biol., 177, 332-347, 1996.
- Paradis, H., Arceci, R.J., Adams, L. and Gendron, R.L. Differentiation
responses of embryonic endothelium to leukemia inhibitory factor.
Exp. Cell Res., 240, 7-15, 1998.
- Hatzopoulos AK, Folkman J, Vasile E, Eiselen GK, and Rosenberg
RD. Isolation and characterization of endothelial progenitor cells
from mouse embryos. Development 125(8), 1457-1468, 1998.
- Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R,
Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, and Isner JM. Isolation of
putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science
275, 964-967, 1997.
|